The icd was not returned for analysis.The analysis is therefore based on the inspection of the quality documents associated with the manufacture of this particular device as well as on the returned device data.The manufacturing process for this device was reviewed.All production steps had been performed accordingly.There was no sign of any inconsistency during the manufacturing process.The final acceptance test proved the icd functions to be as specified.The returned device data have been analyzed.Analysis revealed that the icd did not activate the eri battery status, as mentioned in the complaint.Instead, the icd activated the battery status eos.The activation of the eos battery status resulted from a large amount of successive charging cycles with shock deliveries within a short period of time.A number of 40 charging cycles was performed by the device within 25 minutes on april 3rd, 2024.As indicated by the available iegms, all shocks were appropriately delivered.Only intrinsic heart signals led to a vf storm.The battery status eos was successfully reset.Analysis of the data after reset revealed a normal and expected functioning of the icd.The battery status is bos.The analysis did not show any anomalies.In conclusion, the device was not returned for analysis.The review of the quality documents confirmed a regular device manufacturing.The analysis of the returned device data revealed no indication of a device malfunction.
|