This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.Udi: (b)(4).
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The investigation has been updated to reflect the correct information: investigation summary: according to the information received, it was reported that intra-op a part of the metallic tip fell into the joint.Surgeon could retrieve it after a while.The product was not returned to depuy synthes mitek, however photos were provided for review.See attachments (tripolar defekt (1).Jpg, tripolar defekt (2).Jpg, tripolar defekt (3).Jpg) the photo investigation revealed that the vapr tripolar 90 suction elect had the active tip detached from the device.No other anomaly could be observed.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the vapr tripolar 90 suction elect would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, a potential cause is traced to the procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure.Multiple factors are associated with this type of failure, the complaint device needs to be physically evaluated in order to determine why the customer experienced the failure.As per ifu-111094, carefully insert and withdraw electrodes to avoid possible damage to the device, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device u2311120, and no non-conformances were identified.
|