Unknown/ asked but not available.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced in the initial surgery.The device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 04/22/2024.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection of the suspect product revealed there was damage present on the plunger rod tip that could be attributed to damage that occurred during shipping.The cartridge was presented with viscoelastic residue dispersed through the length of the cartridge.The lens module was inspected and no damaged or viscoelastic residue was present.The lens present cosmetic damaged to the optic body and haptics.No further evaluation was performed.The complaint issue "hm-unspecified injury", "pt-unplanned vitrectomy", and "pt-removal and replacement " were not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there was no product deficiency or product malfunction that could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|