• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 REBAR; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 REBAR; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK-NV-REBAR
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Headache (1880); Blurred Vision (2137); Post Operative Wound Infection (2446); Pseudoaneurysm (2605); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Event Date 10/06/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Raynald, yang,h., tong, x.,huo, x., li, x., liu, l., sui, b., qu, h., dong, k., wang, y., wang, s., miao, z., mo, d.Stenting versus medical treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a matched-control study.J neurointervent surg.2023.15:1021¿1026.Doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-019191 summary: this prospective cohort study compared the outcomes of stenting and medical treatment for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (iih) and venous sinus stenosis (vss).In this single-center cohort study, patients with iih and vss were evaluated between january 2014 and december 2019 with follow-up periods of 1, 3, and 6 months.The patients received either stenting or medical treatment.The two groups underwent 1:1 matching using propensity score analysis, and the clinical outcomes were compared.Following 1:1 matching, 36 patients who underwent stenting and 36 who underwent medical treatment were matched.The median improvements in the papilledema frisén grade were greater in the stenting group at 1month (-2 vs 0), 3 months (-3 vs -1), and 6 months (-3 vs -1) than in the medical treatment group.Patients who received stenting treatment had a significantly higher prevalence of complete resolution of their respective symptoms (headache, tinnitus, or visual disturbances) at 3 months (58.3% vs 13.9%, or 8.68, 95% ci 2.74 to 27.52) and 6 months (80.6% vs 22.2%, or 14.50, 95%ci 4.64 to 45.32) than those receiving medical treatment.This matched-control study shows that stenting has a greater efficacy rate and rapid resolution of papilledema and its respective symptoms compared with medical treatment.Reported events: after the stenting treatment, 24 patients had gastrointestinal discomfort, 11 patients had menorrhagia, three patients had gingival bleeding, and one patient had fundus hemorrhage.Pulmonary infection occurred in one patient.A pseudoaneurysm at the femoral puncture site was found in one patient.Of all the patients who received stenting treatment, three received a second stent placement.One patient had bilateral papilledema and a second stent was placed at the contralateral venous sinus.Another patient showed improved symptoms after stent placement, with the symptoms worsening later.One year after stenting significant re-stenosis was observed and further stent placement was performed.In another patient, symptoms improved after the first stent placement; however, there was no resolution of the papilledema and occasional headache and blurred vision remained.Three months later, a second stent placement was performed and no worsening of blurred vision was observed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No specific device information provided.No event date was provided the event date used was the date the article was published.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REBAR
Type of Device
CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key19130438
MDR Text Key340447335
Report Number2029214-2024-00680
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK-NV-REBAR
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-NV-REBAR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/09/2024
Initial Date FDA Received04/18/2024
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
-
-