• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_THERMOCOOL SF NAV; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC UNK_THERMOCOOL SF NAV; CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_THERMOCOOL SF NAV
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Laceration(s) of Esophagus (2398)
Event Date 08/24/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: francke a, naumann g, weidauer mc, scharfe f, schoen s, wunderlich c, christoph m.Esophageal safety in close-guided 50¿w high-power-short-duration pulmonary vein isolation: the preheat-pvi-registry.J cardiovasc electrophysiol.2022 nov;33(11):2276-2284.Doi: 10.1111/jce.15656.Epub 2022 aug 24.Pmid: 35979645.No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because the lot number was provided by the customer.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster inc, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: francke a, naumann g, weidauer mc, scharfe f, schoen s, wunderlich c, christoph m.Esophageal safety in close-guided 50¿w high-power-short-duration pulmonary vein isolation: the preheat-pvi-registry.J cardiovasc electrophysiol.2022 nov;33(11):2276-2284.Doi: 10.1111/jce.15656.Epub 2022 aug 24.Pmid: 35979645.Objective/methods/study data: introduction: pulmonary vein isolation (pvi) using high-power-short-duration (hpsd) radiofrequency ablation (rf) is emerging as the standard of care for treatment of atrial fibrillation (af).While procedural short-term to midterm efficacy and efficiency are very promising, this registry aims to investigate esopahgeal safety using an optimized ablation approach.Methods: in a single-center experience, (b)(4) consecutive standardized first-time af ablation were performed using a close-guided-fixed-50 w-circumferential pvi and substrate modification without intraprocedural esophageal temperature measurement.Three hundred patients underwent postprocedural esophageal endoscopy to diagnose and grade endoscopically detected esophageal lesions (edel) and were included in the analysis.Results: edel were detected in (b)(4), (b)(4) were low-grade (b)(6)-classification (kcc) 1 lesions with fast healing tendencies.(b)(4) patients suffered kcc 2a lesions, (b)(4).No esophageal perforation or fistula formation was observed.Patient baseline characteristics, especially patients age, gender, and body mass index did not influence edel incidence.Additional posterior box isolation did not increase the incidence of edel.In patients diagnosed with edel, mean catheter contact force during posterior wall ablation was higher (11.9 ± 1.8 vs.14.7 ± 3 g, p <.001), mean rf duration was shorter (11.9 ± 1 vs.10.7 ± 1.2 s, p <.001), while achieved ablation index was not different between groups (434 ± 4.9 vs.433 ± 9.5, n.S.).Conclusion: incidence of edel after close-guided-50 w-hpsd pvi is lower compared to historical cohorts using standard-power rf settings.Catheter contact force during posterior hpsd ablation should not exceed 15 g lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense device possibly associated with reported adverse events thermocool smarttouch sf catheter concomitant biosense webster devices that were used in this study: carto, lasso, smart- ablate rf generator.Concomitant non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: abbott agilis medium curve sheaths and an abbott brk needle adverse event(s) and provided interventions possibly associated with unidentified thermocool smarttouch sf ablation catheter: qty (b)(4) ¿ (esophageal ulcer) (recognized procedural complication).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNK_THERMOCOOL SF NAV
Type of Device
CARDIAC ABLATION PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC
31 technology drive, suite 200
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC (JUAREZ)
circuito interior norte
1820parque industrial salvacar
juarez 32599
MX   32599
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
3035526892
MDR Report Key19150478
MDR Text Key340674868
Report Number2029046-2024-01320
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LPB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/22/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_THERMOCOOL SF NAV
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/27/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ABBOTT AGILIS MEDIUM CURVE SHEATH; ABBOTT BRK NEEDLE; CARTO; LASSO; SMART- ABLATE RF GENERATOR
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-