Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Section e1.Initial reporter phone: +(b)(6).Section h3 - the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date as indicated as ¿other¿ in this section as the reason for non-evaluation.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.This is one of two products involved with the complaint and the associated manufacturer report numbers are 3008114965-2024-00417 and 3008114965-2024-00418.
|
As reported by the health authority, during an endovascular embolization to the middle cerebral artery, a prowler select plus 150/5cm microcatheter (606s255x, 31113004) was used to deliver the eu 4.5x28mm stent 12 mm dw tip intracranial stent (enc452812, 7469246) became impeded in the microcatheter (mc) and could not be delivered to be opened, which is unable to achieve therapeutic effect.The physician retracted the stent and microcatheter and switched to new devices to complete the surgery.Additional event information received on 22-apr-2024 indicated that they were not able to torque the device.There was no evidence of physical material within the device.The resistance was felt at the distal tip.No other devices were successfully used with the concomitant device prior to the encountered resistance.The microcatheter did not kink or bent.Adequate flush was maintained through the devices.There were no procedural delays due to the event.
|