• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL TRUESPAN 24 DEGREE PEEK; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL TRUESPAN 24 DEGREE PEEK; FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 228152
Device Problem Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/07/2024
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary :a photo was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.The depuy synthes mitek team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photo.Upon visualization of the photo returned, it was observed a partial part of the applier needle, in which was noted that the plate is slipped towards the needle outlet.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the truespan 24 degree peek would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the possible root cause can be attributed to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; the operator did not squeeze the red trigger to its fully position, therefore the plate was not released, however this cannot be conclusively determined.As per ifu, at desired depth, fully squeeze the red deployment trigger while maintaining depth positioning to deliver the first implant.The implant is fully deployed when you hear an audible ¿click¿.Therefore, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.There was no non conformance regarding this lot.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Udi: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported by the healthcare professional from china that during an anterior cruciate ligament (acl) repair procedure, it was discovered that the truespan 24 degree peek device could not fire.It was not reported if there were any delays to the surgical procedure.It was reported that a spare device was used to complete the surgery.There was patient involvement reported.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the investigation has been completed, and if additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Investigation summary: the product was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.Depuy synthes mitek then conducted visual inspection and functional test of device received.The device was received whit its white tray.The device was evaluated.When performing the visual inspection, it could be observed that the first plate was not fully deployed due to a very small part of the plate remains inside the applier needle, it does not show any structural anomaly.The covering sleeve was removed to verify the presence of the second plate, it was still attached to the needle.The red trigger was found in good condition.No structural anomalies that can interfere with a full deployment were found.The functional test was performed to the second plate.The applier needle was introduced into a soft tissue simulator, the red trigger was fully squeezed, the second plate was successfully deployed, no obstruction or difficulties while deploying were found.It was verified that the pusher shaft tip is sliding out completely from the applier needle.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the truespan 24 degree peek would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the possible root cause can be traced to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; the operator did not squeezed the red trigger to its fully position, therefore the plate was not released.As per ifu, at desired depth, fully squeeze the red deployment trigger while maintaining depth positioning to deliver the first implant.The implant is fully deployed when you hear an audible ¿click¿.Therefore, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review: a review of the batch manufacturing records was conducted on finished lot number 203l263: and no related non-conformances were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRUESPAN 24 DEGREE PEEK
Type of Device
FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SàRL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle 02400
SZ  02400
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin blanc 38
le locle CH-24 00
SZ   CH-2400
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key19167766
MDR Text Key341676252
Report Number1221934-2024-01275
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBI
UDI-Device Identifier10886705026029
UDI-Public10886705026029
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K153667
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/23/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number228152
Device Lot Number203L263
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/02/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/28/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age31 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-