• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER SPINE-US UNKNOWN_SPINE_PRODUCT; THORACOLUMBOSACRAL PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER SPINE-US UNKNOWN_SPINE_PRODUCT; THORACOLUMBOSACRAL PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_SPN
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Spinal Cord Injury (2432)
Event Date 08/28/2020
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H3 other text : device location unknown.
 
Event Description
The article 'accuracy of fluoroscopic guidance with the coaxial view of the pedicle for percutaneous insertion of lumbar pedicle screws and risk factors for pedicle breach' in journal of neurosurgery: spine, august 28, 2020, was reviewed.In this study the authors aimed to evaluate the rate of malposition, including pedicle breach and superior facet violation, after percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws using the coaxial fluoroscopic view of the pedicle, and to assess the risk factors for pedicle breach.In total, 394 percutaneous screws placed in 85 patients using the coaxial fluoroscopic view of the pedicle between january 2014 and september 2017 were assessed, and 445 pedicle screws inserted in 116 patients using conventional open procedures were used for reference.Four percutaneous systems were used: es2, solera longitude (medtronic), solera voyager (medtronic), and precept (nuvasive).The pedicle screw was conventionally inserted using the midline open approach or the wiltse paraspinal approach.In all the conventional open procedures, screws were inserted before decompression and interbody implant placement; xia, arsenal (alphatec), and solera (medtronic) systems were used.Superior facet violation was evaluated as follows: grade 0, screw placement clearly outside the boundaries of the facet joint capsule; grade 1, pedicle screw abutting the facet joint capsule and superior articular process but not violating the facet joint articular surface; and grade 2, pedicle screw clearly violating any part of the articular surface of the facet joint.The accuracy of the percutaneous screw placement into the pedicle walls was classified as follows: grade 0, completely within the pedicle; grade 1, pedicle breach <2 mm; grade 2, pedicle breach of 2¿4 mm, and grade 3, pedicle breach > 4 mm.Two of the 394 screws inserted percutaneously showed a grade 2 violation, whereas 3 and 5 screws out of the 445 screws inserted conventionally showed grade 1 and 2 violations, respectively.All violations of the articular surface were small, and no revision was required.These screws did not cause neurological deficits, abnormal pain, or revision.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN_SPINE_PRODUCT
Type of Device
THORACOLUMBOSACRAL PEDICLE SCREW SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER SPINE-US
2 pearl court
allendale NJ 07401
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER SPINE-FRANCE
zone industrielle de marticot
cestas 33610
FR   33610
Manufacturer Contact
rita karan
2 pearl court
allendale, NJ 07401
2017608000
MDR Report Key19215928
MDR Text Key341423508
Report Number0009617544-2024-00058
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/30/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/30/2024
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_SPN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/01/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-