It was reported that, on (b)(6) the patient fell right on the pump and had a cervical spine fracture.He went to the emergency room that day and was admitted about four hours later.It was indicated that, when the pump was read, it showed a motor stall and a tube set message.It was believed that the stall occurred on (b)(6) and perhaps the fall had something to do with it.It was noted that the patient had not had an mri since the fall, only ct scans.At that time of report, the patient was in a lot of pain and was on patient-controlled analgesia (pca) with dilaudid.The device system was used to deliver clonidine, dilaudid, and marcaine.Five days later, it was reported that telemetry confirmed that a critical alarm was occurring due to the motor stall, but the alarm was not heard.It was noted that, when the reporter accessed the logs, there was difficulty keeping telemetry.The logs showed that the tube set message had occurred on (b)(6).At the time of report, the stall was constant and the pump had been set to minimum rate.It was indicated that the patient had suffered a heart attack and then fell.The patient was being treated by an intensive-care unit physician in the hospital and it was stated that they had not used cardioversion while treating the patient.Fifteen days later, it was reported that, one week prior to the fall, the patient was fine and was receiving effective therapy with no issues.It was unknown if the motor stall occurred prior to or after the fall; however, it was determined that the device and therapy had nothing to do with the heart attack.It was also stated that the cervical spine fracture had occurred when the patient fell and was not pre-existing.
|