Images relating to this complaint were received and have been sent for review to med institute.Upon receipt of the med institute review, the investigation will be amended and a f/u report will be submitted.The complaint info provided indicated the device involved in this complaint to be a zilver vascular stent.The exact rpn is unk.The rpn ziv6-35-80-8-60 was used for purposes of completing the complaint investigation and regulatory reports.A zilver vascular stent was initially placed on (b)(6) 2011 in the left common and left external iliac artery.A ct scan on (b)(6) 2013 noted the stent fractured in three places which is leading to a type 1d endoleak from an evar.The pt was on outpatient status and was stable.On the (b)(6) 2014, a stent graft limb (medtronic) was implanted to address the type 1b leak.The complaint info provided indicated the device involved in this complaint to be a zilver vascular stent.The exact rpn is unk.As the lot number was not provided; it was therefore not possible to establish if there were any devices from the affected lot numbers in stock at the time of the complaint investigation.A document based investigation was carried out as the complaint device was not available for eval.A review of the mfg records for this device could not be carried out as the lot number was not provided.Prior to distribution all ziv6-35-80-8-60 devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.Images in relation to this complaint have been received and sent for review to med institute.Upon receipt of the med institute review the investigation will be amended and a f/u report will be submitted.Stent strut fracture is a known potential adverse effect as per the instructions for use for this device.As the device was not available to be returned, the cause of the complaint could not be conclusively determined.Customer quality assurance will continue t monitor complaints of this nature for potential emerging trends.
|