• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC CARDIOVASCULAR VALIANT; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC CARDIOVASCULAR VALIANT; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT Back to Search Results
Device Problems Leak/Splash (1354); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Inaccurate Delivery (2339)
Patient Problems Pulmonary Embolism (1498); Aneurysm (1708); Death (1802); Occlusion (1984); Paralysis (1997); Renal Failure (2041); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 02/01/2014
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
Medtronic received the following information obtained from the journal article entitled: reintervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of complicated aortic dissection.Elsa m.Faure, md, ludovic canaud, md, phd, camille agostini, md, roxane shaub, md,gudrun böge, md, charles marty-ané, md, phd, and pierre alric, md, phd.J vasc surg 2014;59:327-33.Valiant and talent thoracic stent grafts were implanted in patient's for the endovascular treatment of complicated chronic aortic dissection, aortic aneurysm >55 mm, rapid aneurysmal enlargement or impending rupture (>5mmover 6 months), rupture, saccular aneurysm >20 mm, malperfusion syndrome, or intractable chest pain under medical therapy involving the descending thoracic aorta between october 2000 and december 2011 in zone 2 and zone 3.Vessel morphology was reported as there were some patient¿s with short proximal landing zone (<(><<)>20 mm), tortuous seal zone, pre-operative dissections and subclavian bypasses prior to stent graft placement.Secondary interventions: stent graft migration, proximal type i endoleak, distal type i endoleak, type ii endoleak, aneurysmal evolution of the descending thoracic aorta, aneurysmal expansion of the dissected abdominal aorta in one patient ,retrograde dissection, rupture of the right external iliac artery, inaccurate delivery, intentional and unintentional coverage of the left common carotid artery, cva, pulmonary embolism, paralysis, renal issues, inaccurate delivery, occlusion, aneurysm enlargement, and death.Objective: this study assessed predictive factors for reintervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (tevar) for complicated aortic dissection (c-ad).Methods: an institutional review of consecutive tevar for c-ad was performed.Results: between 2000 and 2011, 41 patients underwent tevar for a c-ad involving the descending thoracic aorta.Primary indications included aneurysm >55mm in 24, rapid aneurysmal enlargement or impending rupture in 6, saccular aneurysm >20 mm in 1, malperfusion in 1, intractable chest pain in 3, and rupture in 6.Technical success was achieved in 100%.The 30-day mortality rate was 5% (n[2).Fourteen secondary procedures were performed in 13 patients (32%) for indications of device migration in 2, proximal type i endoleak in 5, distal type i endoleak in 2, type ii endoleak in 1, aneurysmal evolution of the descending thoracic aorta in 2, aneurysmal expansion of the dissected abdominal aorta in 1, and retrograde dissection in 1.Multivariate analysis demonstrated that oversizing (b)(4) (odds ratio [or], 16; p[.011), bare-spring stent in the proximal landing zone of the stent graft (or, 12; p [.032), and anticoagulant therapy (or, 78; p [.03) were significant factors for reintervention.On univariate analysis, large aneurysm was a risk factor for reintervention (p [.002), whereas complete false lumen thrombosis at the stent graft level was protective (p <(><<)>.05).Conclusions: this study confirms the feasibility of tevar for c-ad, although the rate of reintervention is high.Excessive oversizing, a bare-spring stent graft in the proximal landing zone, large aortic dilatation, and anticoagulant therapy were factors associated with reintervention.Complete false lumen thrombosis at the stent graft level was protective.(j vasc surg 2014;59:327-33.).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation results: inherent risk of procedure (migration, endoleak, retrograde dissection, rupture of the right external iliac artery, inaccurate delivery, cva, pulmonary embolism, paralysis, renal issues, occlusion, aneurysm enlargement, and death).Patient¿s condition affected effectiveness of device (anatomy related: short proximal landing zone (<(><<)>20 mm), tortuous seal zone).(unknown cause of all events).Evaluation conclusion: device failure/lack of effectiveness related to patient condition (anatomy related: short proximal landing zone (<(><<)>20 mm), tortuous seal zone).(unknown cause of all events).Evaluation conclusion: device failure/lack of effectiveness related to patient condition (anatomy related: short proximal landing zone (<(><<)>20 mm), tortuous seal zone).(unknown cause of all events).(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VALIANT
Type of Device
SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC CARDIOVASCULAR
3576 unocal place
santa rosa CA 95403
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC CARDIOVASCULAR
3576 unocal place
santa rosa CA 95403
Manufacturer Contact
ludmila voulfson
3576 unocal place
santa rosa, CA 95403
7075661229
MDR Report Key3645010
MDR Text Key4184709
Report Number2953200-2014-00330
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MIH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P100040
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 02/03/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/25/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/03/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Required Intervention;
Patient Age00066 YR
-
-