Catalog Number 03.100.090 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that on an unknown date the tip from the bender broke.The customer doesn¿t know where the fragment is and when the issue happened.No further information was reported.This is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/ explanted.Investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn as no device was received.A review of the device history records was performed and no complaint related issues were found.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: an evaluation was performed on the returned device.As per received condition the device; the tip of the article broken off.The complained device has been checked according to the manufacturing and material specifications and it was determined that the requirements and specifications have been fulfilled.Based on this result manufacturing failure can be excluded.The clamp is broken and next to the break deformed also, it shows that excessive force has been applied for a short time, which has led to this damage.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|