Additional narrative: a manufacturing evaluation was conducted.The report indicates that lack of the threaded shaft it was not possible to measure the main features of the complained screw relevant for the issue under investigation.The other 3 screws of the same lot returned were measured and found within specification.On the basis of the analysis of the 3 unbroken screws the lot 8597921 is conforming from a manufacturing perspective.The conclusion of the product investigation is that there is no evidence of nonconformances manufacturing related.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Additional narrative: device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.An additional manufacturing evaluation was completed: four intermaxillary fixation (imf) screws were sent to investigation, three of them were in the original packaging and not damaged, one of the imf screws was broken.Macroscopic assessment revealed at the broken screw a fracture surface at the first convoluted close to the screw head.Tissues and/or bone residues could be documented at the thread close to the fracture area, the slots and the transversal holes were not damaged or deformed, and it is likely that the screws correctly connected to the screwdriver.Macroscopic assessment of the fracture surface revealed a not damaged fracture area with a plastically deformed first convolution from the thread.The examination by scanning electron microscope (sem) revealed torsional deformation lines on the entire fracture areas at the broken screw and bone and tissues residues, at higher magnification dimple structure in a preferred direction could be documented, an unequivocal indication of a ductile forced fracture mechanism under torsional load.The microstructure of the used material was examined in a cross section and found to be according to the standards.There were no evident irregularities or signs of embrittlement.The screws are manufactured from stainless steel, which is specified as surgical implant material in the standard iso 5832-1, the astm standard f-138 and f139.From the article number together with the fabrication lot number, we can trace the production records as well as the implant material lot, its intense and systematic material acceptance testing and was released for manufacturing only after compliance with the specifications had been established.The investigation performed could not detect any material faults.The imf screw broke according to a ductile forced fracture mechanism.The fine dimple structure on the entire fracture surface is a clear indication of a ductile forced fracture.It is likely the screw was overloaded i the axial direction.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Additional narrative: a pd event evaluation was conducted.The report indicates test report mt01-161 showed a safety factor of 1.5 between failure torque and maximum insertion torque for the 12mm long version of the stainless steel imf screw (201.932).Estimated occurrence rate determined to be 0.03%.Pd investigation result: indeterminate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|