• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SGC01ST
Device Problem Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 02/20/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
This event is being filed as the steerable guide catheter soft tip became torn during removal of the clip delivery system.A torn tip has the potential to cause or contribute to patient injury.It was reported that during a mitraclip procedure, the transseptal puncture was performed and no significant atrial septum defect was created.Due to the patient's anatomy being "twisted", the clip could not grasp the leaflets.It was decided not to continue with the procedure and remove the clip without deploying it.During removal of the clip delivery system (cds) with the undeployed clip, the clip became caught on the soft tip of the steerable guide catheter (sgc).Troubleshooting maneuvers were performed, but the clip could not be removed from the soft tip.The cds and sgc were removed as one unit from the anatomy.There was no patient injury.After removal of the devices, the sgc soft tip was observed to be torn.Post procedure, the degenerative mitral regurgitation remained at the preprocedure grade 4 and the patient was stable.No additional information was provided.
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the previously filed medwatch, additional information received: the tip of the steerable guide catheter was straightened and the clip was closed prior to removal.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the steerable guide catheter (sgc) was returned for investigation.The sgc was returned with the clip delivery system (cds) within it and the sgc soft tip was in the clip arms.The soft tip was observed to be torn.Microscopic inspection of the soft tip confirmed that there was no missing material.No other damages were noted on the sgc device.Potential causes for difficulty retracting the cds into the guide tip, resulting in soft tip damage/tears are, but not limited to, manufacturing anomalies, procedural conditions (curves on the sgc during cds removal) or user technique.As part of the mitraclip manufacturing process, all devices are subject to visual, dimensional and functional inspection to verify product quality.Review of the device history record confirmed this device passed all in-process and final inspections.There were no non-conformances issued for this lot that would have contributed to the reported event.A query of the electronic complaint handling database indicated there had been no similar torn tip incidents reported for this lot.The user also reported no issue while functionally inspecting the sgc during device preparation, which is an indication that the soft tip was not damaged prior to use.With respect to procedural conditions and/or user technique, difficulty retracting the clip into the sgc can be influenced by the clip not being fully closed upon removal, the orientation of the clip with respect to the tip, or curves on the sgc applied by the user.The information provided in the case details stated that the clip had become caught during retraction into the sgc.Additionally, troubleshooting attempts were unsuccessfully made to free the clip from the tip.It was noted that the sgc was straightened and the clip was fully closed during cds removal, indicating that the user removed the device per the instructions for use.In this case, it is possible that due to the orientation of the clip with respect to the sgc tip, one of the clip arms became stuck on the tip and was therefore difficult to remove.Based on the information reviewed, it was determined that the reported tear in the sgc soft tip was caused by the attempted removal of the cds device from the anatomy, and is related to operational context / user technique.There is no indication of a product quality deficiency with respect to the manufacturing, design, or labeling of the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Concomitant products: mitraclip system: lift, support plate, stabilizer, clip delivery system.The steerable guide catheter has been received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The clip delivery system reported is being filed under another medwatch mfr number.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER
Type of Device
STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key3710083
MDR Text Key4264927
Report Number2024168-2014-01876
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K112239
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/20/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/28/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2014
Device Catalogue NumberSGC01ST
Device Lot Number10284175
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/11/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/06/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
CONCOMITANT MEDICAL DEVICES
Patient Age83 YR
Patient Weight79
-
-