• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BRANDYWINE 90 DEG TI S-HOOK/LEFT; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BRANDYWINE 90 DEG TI S-HOOK/LEFT; PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 04.601.001
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The revision surgery of a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib system was reported.The patient was originally treated for thoracic insufficiency syndrome on (b)(6) 2012.It was reported that on an unknown date, the patient may have complained of pain and it was discovered via x-rays on (b)(6) 2014 that the s-hook at the bottom of the construct was broken.The surgeon decided to explant the s-hook and the two parallel connectors and implanted an s-rod and two new parallel connectors.It was reported that the s-hook was broken at the top straight rod of the hook.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).This report is for s-hook.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.(b)(6).The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: weight reported as (b)(6).A manufacturing evaluation was completed: the device was received with post manufacturing damage consisting of dents, nicks, and gouges on several surface areas and is broken into two pieces.The severed region of the rod occurred in the area where the ti parallel connectors were used.These items are consistent with use.There was no issues identified that pertained to the complaint condition; the device was received with post manufacturing damage so one of the features could be properly evaluated but that feature would not have impacted the complaint condition.All other features relevant to the part met specification; there, the cause is unconfirmed.The complaint condition pertaining to the broken s-hook was confirmed.The feature that was not able to be evaluated now was verified during final inspection during manufacturing.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) a product development evaluation was performed for the subject device.The subject device, part number 04.601.001, left 90 degree s-hook, lot # 64865338, was received with numerous dents and a portion of the rod is broken in two pieces.The location of the two primary dents correspond with the mating ti parallel connector was attached and the fractured surface appears to have occurred at the transition zone between the connector and the rod.The veptr device is designed to mechanically stabilize and distract the thorax to correct three dimensional thoracic deformities and provide improvement in volume for respiration and lung growth in infantile and juvenile patients diagnosed with thoracic insufficiency syndrome.The veptr devices are attached perpendicular to the patient¿s natural ribs, or to the lumbar vertebra or ilium.Part 04.641.001 is an s-hook used with the distal extension and connector to attach to the ilium.The drawing associated with the part was reviewed.The drawing calls out the appropriate dimensions, material and finishing processes for a successful design.The returned left 90 degree s-hook, 04.641.001/ lot # 64865338, has been received with numerous dents and a portion of the rod is broken in two pieces.The location of the two primary dents correspond with the mating ti parallel connector was attached and the fractured surface appears to have occurred at the transition zone between the connector and the rod.No design related issues were identified with the returned part.The breakage of the s-hook most likely occurred due to excessive force applied on the implant.The complaint condition was confirmed.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
90 DEG TI S-HOOK/LEFT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BRANDYWINE
1303 goshen parkway
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key3720687
MDR Text Key4335095
Report Number2530088-2014-10045
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PH030009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/17/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/02/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number04.601.001
Device Lot Number6486538
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/25/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/05/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/28/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Weight42
-
-