Prosthesis was implanted (b)(6) 2013 in the c5-c6 disc space; in addition, an acdf was performed at c3-c4.In a f/u office visit, the patient reported feeling a sense of pressure in the throat; the device was determined to have migrated anteriorly sufficiently to require removal of the device on (b)(6) 2014.No injury is known to have occurred.
|
(b)(4).The reported event has been confirmed via radiograph.Further evaluation of the explanted product is not possible; the product has been retained by the facility.The patient concurrently underwent an acdf procedure.No root cause has been identified.Review of the dhr for the lot indicates all specifications have been met.Labeling review: "risks associated with implants in the spine, including the pcm cervical disc device, are: early or late loosening of the components; disassembly; bending or breakage of any or all of the components; implant migration; malpositioning of the implant; loss of purchase; sizing issues with components; anatomical or technical difficulties."."the safety and effectiveness of this device has not been established in patients with the following conditions:.Fusion at an adjacent vertebral level.Similar to the experience in acdf control group, the use of the pcm cervical disc at a spinal level adjacent to a previous fusion may lead to clinical outcomes inferior to those observed for patients without a prior adjacent level fusion.For the pcm cervical disc, these include, but are not limited to, possible implant migration and higher incidence of subsequent device removal.
|