This device is an instrument and is not implanted or explanted.A device history review was conducted.The report indicates that were no ncrs were generated during production.There were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Additional narrative: a manufacturing evaluation was completed: the coupling tip of the trial had broken off.The broken off part is jammed in the applicator knob.Our investigation of the complained trial implant, article 03.812.311, and the applicator knob, 03.812.004, has shown that the coupling tip of the trial had broken off.The broken off part is jammed in the applicator knob.The applicator knob shows hammering marks on the top and the release function is not working.The fracture surface on the trial is homogenous what indicates material conformity.The manufacturing review of both instruments shows that the production procedure was according to the specifications and there were no issues that would contribute to this complaint condition.It is likely that strong hammering on the applicator knob during the surgery led to the breakage of the trial tip.Because of the damage, the complaint relevant dimensions cannot be checked for dimensional accuracy of the valid manufacturing specifications.No product fault could be detected.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|