• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ENTERRA; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 3116
Device Problems Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
Patient Problems Burn(s) (1757); Itching Sensation (1943); Muscle Spasm(s) (1966); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Skin Discoloration (2074); Swelling (2091); Burning Sensation (2146); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Malaise (2359); Electric Shock (2554); Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Date 03/28/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had a gastric neurostimulator.The patient had a burn at the neurostimulator pocket site.The pocket site had 2nd degree burn at the ins site.The burning symptom was not present a month prior to the report.The device was constantly hurting with severe burning.The implant was on at the time of the report and the doctor had just adjusted it.The doctor thought the device caused the burn.It was further reported that 3 weeks prior to the report the patient got an electrical burn.The patient had a little blister on their stomach that itched so the patient scratched it.The next day the patient looked at it and it was brown.It looked like someone stuck a cigarette to their stomach.The patient was also having burning at the pocket site.The patient had different symptoms and pain on the right and left side.The patient was rushed to the hospital the night prior to the report and their doctor turned the device off.X-rays were taken to see if the leads were loose.The patient was getting burned and shocked and starting having burning on the skin and in the eyes.Their right side was ¿jumping all over the place¿.The patient was considering having their entire system explanted and redone.The doctor originally thought the burn looked like skin cancer but it came on too fast.The patient was having burning all around the stimulator.The patient¿s previous doctor said that the burning had nothing to do with the stimulator.The patient had a quarter inch scar and the scab had fallen off.The patient¿s doctor thought that the implant was infected but no one was giving the patient antibiotics.The patient also had a cold.The patient¿s current doctor thought that it was an electrical burn.The patient was having a lot of pain which was jumping from left to right and burning from their throat down to their stomach and onto the stimulator.The patient was also having burning on the skin and eyes.The patient took narcain and musinex 2 days prior to the report and on the day of the report.The patient was still having some intense pain for hours the night prior to the report after they turned their stimulator off.The patient had stabbing, shocking pain almost like the device was turned up all the way.The patient was also having a contraction and was trying to breathe through it.The patient noted that they had had so many problems.The patient also did not like the size of the implant since it put it right on the hip bone and rib.It was noted that toward the patient¿s belly button it was swollen, the patient had a fever, and there was an infection.It was further reported that the doctor last saw the patient on (b)(6).The patient was still experiencing severe burning and things seemed to be getting worse.One of the patient¿s doctors thought that the incision site was infected.It was unknown if a culture was taken by one of the patient¿s doctors.Additional information has been requested, but was not available as of the date of this report.If additional information is received, a follow up report will be sent.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that it was unknown what caused the electrical burn and the health care provider (hcp) doubted that it was caused by the stimulator.No testing was done on the device and no infection was found.It was noted that it was unknown what caused the shocking and burning sensation to the patient¿s skin and eyes.No interventions were planned and the patient was following up with their gastrointestinal hcp.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id 435135, serial# (b)(4), implanted: 2011-(b)(6), product type lead, product id 435135, serial# (b)(4), implanted: 2011-(b)(4), product type lead.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was later reported as far as the reporter knew the patient's device was off.It was stated it was unknown if the symptoms had resolved with turning the device off and no further testing or interventions had been done.It was noted as far as they knew the patient was fine and they had not heard from them since (b)(6) 2014.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a consumer.It was reported that a couple years ago, the patient had a ¿cigarette burn¿ on their stomach from the ins.The patient felt the burn from ¿from the inside out¿.It was noted that the ins impedances were checked and everything was fine.The patient didn¿t believe the healthcare provider (hcp) did a good job implanting the ins.No further complications were reported/anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product id: 435135, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2011, product type: lead; product id: 435135, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2011, product type: lead.Due to imdrf harmonization, results, methods, and conclusion codes were updated.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERRA
Type of Device
INTESTINAL STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key3759322
MDR Text Key4468081
Report Number3004209178-2014-07504
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H990014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional,consumer,health profess
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/18/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/28/2012
Device Model Number3116
Device Catalogue Number3116
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/13/2018
Date Device Manufactured06/07/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age47 YR
Patient Weight49
-
-