• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PERFUSION SYSTEMS BIO CONSOLE 560; CONTROL, PUMP SPEED, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PERFUSION SYSTEMS BIO CONSOLE 560; CONTROL, PUMP SPEED, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number 560BCS1
Device Problem Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/24/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information reporting that after being on bypass for nearly 57 minutes, the high level alarm on the 560 bio-console was triggered, shutting down the external drive motor.The health care professional (hcp) believed that the high level alarm had not been turned on.The perfusionist clamped the venous and arterial lines and reset the high volume alert alarm as well as the bio-console.The perfusionist reported the entire process only took a few seconds and the patient was never compromised.The bio-console was used to successfully complete the case without further issues.It was noted that because of the patient's large body surface area, 3 liters of volume had already been taken off when bypass was started.During normal flow ( i.E.2.4- 2.6 cardiac index for his current temperature) the total bypass circuit needed to hold about 1/3 of the patient's total blood volume, which in this case was almost 10 liters ((b)(6)), so the perfusionist stated there were over 3.3 liters of volume in the reservoir at all t imes.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the event log for the bio-console was reviewed.The customer had stated in their initial event narrative that the upper level sensor was turned off, but the event log showed that at the time of the event the bio-console and upper level sensor had been set to action 2 (2=when low level is detected by sensor, stop motor).The event log from the instrument showed that the upper level sensor properly detected low levels at time 1100:46:22 and stopped the motor as programmed.The user initially attempted to turn the rpm (revolutions per minute) to maximum, but after the motor has stopped the instrument requires that the rpm knob be reset to zero before turning it back up.The user turned the rpm knob to zero at time 1100:47:48 and then resumed rpm and flow.The total time from motor stop to restart was one minute and thirty seconds.The event log showed that after the case the user changed the upper level sensor action from ¿stop motor¿ to ¿alert¿.Following the review of the instrument¿s event log, the medtronic service technician functionally tested the bio-console.The instrument performed normally with no anomalies observed.Medtronic¿s quality engineers confirmed the timeline of events described by the customer, but review of the bio-console memory log showed that the device had not malfunctioned.The level sensor and bio-console performed as programmed, stopping the motor.After one minute and thirty seconds, the user re-established flow and the case was completed successfully with no adverse patient effects.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information reporting that after being on bypass for nearly 57 minutes, the high level alarm on the 560 bio-console was triggered, shutting down the external drive motor.The health care professional (hcp) believed that the high level alarm had not been turned on.The perfusionist clamped the venous and arterial lines and reset the high volume alert alarm as well as the bio-console.The perfusionist reported the entire process only took a few seconds and the patient was never compromised.The bio-console was used to successfully complete the case without further issues.It was noted that because of the patient's large body surface area, 3 liters of volume had already been taken off when bypass was started.During normal flow ( i.E.2.4- 2.6 cardiac index for his current temperature) the total bypass circuit needed to hold about 1/3 of the patient's total blood volume, which in this case was almost 10 liters (132 kg x 75 ml/kg), so the perfusionist stated there were over 3.3 liters of volume in the reservoir at all times.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The bio-console has been received by medtronic's quality laboratory and analysis is currently in process.Upon completion of analysis, a supplemental report will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIO CONSOLE 560
Type of Device
CONTROL, PUMP SPEED, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
PERFUSION SYSTEMS
7611 northland dr
brooklyn park MN 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key3761516
MDR Text Key4619744
Report Number2184009-2014-00023
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K070286
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/24/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/21/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number560BCS1
Device Catalogue Number560BCS1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/08/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/24/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/17/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Weight132
-
-