• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES (USA); PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES (USA); PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following online journal abstract, ¿operative treatment of scoliosis with the use of veptr: our experience¿ (2011).Fairbank, j., macdonald, j.W., nnadi, c., and pyrovolou, n.British editorial society of bone and joint surgery.A retrospective study of 8 children treated with vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) for correction of early onset spinal scoliotic deformities was performed at a spinal orthopaedic department at a hospital in (b)(6).Eight children with progressive scoliosis due to a variety of conditions: six congenital (two goldenhar syndrome, two vacterl syndrome, two congenital thoracic abnormalities), one spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, one early onset of scoliosis, underwent the index procedure and subsequent lengthening procedures at six months intervals (one patient had 11 lengthening procedures).Mean age was 4 years (2-6 years) and mean follow up 3.8 years (2-6 years).Mean preoperative cobb angle was 64,8° (51-108) and mean postoperative angle 40° (31-50).Three patients developed infection with wound breakdown.One patient underwent removal of one of the two veptr rods.In the other two patients the rods were removed followed by antibiotics and the veptr converted to another growing rod system.Overall, patients tolerated the multiple procedures well.Three patients experienced significant distress with multiple surgical procedures.It was concluded that veptr offers a viable treatment option for children with severe congenital and early onset scoliosis where there are no viable alternatives.Complication rate is acceptable in view of the benefits.None of the complications have lead to long term complications to date, but the repeated lengthening have resulted in psychological disturbance which we are investigating further.There is not sufficient information to file multiple reports.This refers to an unknown veptr construct.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device for treatment, not diagnosis.¿operative treatment of scoliosis with the use of veptr: our experience¿ (2011).Fairbank, j., macdonald, j.W., nnadi, c., and pyrovolou, n.British editorial society of bone and joint surgery.This report is for an unknown veptr construct/ unknown lot.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES (USA)
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key3761781
MDR Text Key4421490
Report Number2520274-2014-10916
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PH030009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/11/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/11/2014
Initial Date FDA Received04/21/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-