• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT MITRACLIP SYSTEM STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number SGC0101
Device Problem Torn Material (3024)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/01/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned and the reported damage/tears to the guide tip were confirmed via returned device analysis.No soft tip material appeared to be missing from the tip.The difficulty removing the cds from the sgc could not be replicated as the returned device was not returned in a condition in which the test could be performed.A review of the lot history record revealed no] non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a manufacturing issue.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product deficiency.
 
Event Description
This mitraclip steerable guide catheter (sgc) report is being filed for the torn soft tip that has potential of causing or contributing to serious injury.It was reported that two mitraclips were implanted in the patient with degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) reducing the mr from 4+ to 3+.A third mitraclip was inserted and grasped the leaflets, but it was noted that the mitral valve gradient increased from 2 to 3, up to 9 mm hg.The third clip was not deployed because of the high gradient pressure.The mitral valve gradient came back down to 2 to 3 after the 3rd clip was removed from the leaflets.During removal, the mitraclip delivery system became stuck at the steerable guide catheter (sgc) soft tip.After trouble-shooting maneuvers were performed, such as advancement of the sgc and changing the guide angle, the cds was successfully removed from the sgc.After removal of the sgc, multiple tears were noted on the sgc soft tip, but there were no missing pieces.The patient remained hemodynamically stable.There was no additional information provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Concomitant products: mitraclip system: mitraclip (x3), lift, stabilizer, support plate.The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The third clip delivery system referenced is filed under a separate medwatch mfr number.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MITRACLIP SYSTEM STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER
Type of Device
STEERABLE GUIDE CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer (Section G)
MENLO PARK, CA REG# 3005070406
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key3765368
MDR Text Key11817296
Report Number2024168-2014-02526
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112239
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/01/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/22/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2014
Device Catalogue NumberSGC0101
Device Lot Number10303925
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/02/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/26/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age81 YR
Patient Weight72
-
-