• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES (USA); PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES (USA); PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK - VEPTR
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Post Operative Wound Infection (2446)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Date the abstract was published is unknown.This report is for unknown veptr, unknown part/unkown lot.This report for 5 unknown veptr.Implant, explant dates: unknown without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.(b)(4), comparison of surgical treatments for infantile and juvenile scoliosis, pg# 72 abstract# 30 scoliosis research society, 47th annual meeting & course, sep 5-8, 2012.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following journal article: "scoliosis research society 47th annual meeting and course final program, abstract# 30: joshua m.Pahys et al: comparison of surgical treatments for infantile and juvenile scoliosis.A retrospective review of 31 patients evaluated vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) vs.Growing rods (gr) for the treatment of infantile/juvenile scoliosis.18 patients of the 31 were treated with the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib and the rest of the 13 patients were treated with growing rods.There was no difference between the two groups (age at initial surgery, sex, diagnosis, height/weight, and preop coronal/ sagittal cobb angle).Average follow-up for vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib was 4.2 years vs growing rods 3.5 years.Among the 18 patients that were treated with vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib; complications occured in 8, instrument migration/failure in 12 patients and wound infection in 5 patients.This is report 2 of 4 for (b)(4).This report for unknown veptr, implanted in 5 patients.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, RIB REPLACEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES (USA)
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key3765508
MDR Text Key21169079
Report Number2520274-2014-10989
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PH030009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/03/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK - VEPTR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/03/2014
Initial Date FDA Received04/22/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-