• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE HELEX SEPTAL OCCLUDER; OCCLUDER, TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE HELEX SEPTAL OCCLUDER; OCCLUDER, TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL Back to Search Results
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Arrhythmia (1721)
Event Date 03/13/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This information was received through yet unpublished literature article " (b)(6).The article reports the following outcomes at the first clinical follow-up for patients with a gore helex septal occluder implant: two patients presented with arrhythmia.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No additional information has been provided to gore regarding the reported event.(b)(6).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE HELEX SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Type of Device
OCCLUDER, TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
KENDRICK PEAK MPD B/P
4250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86001
Manufacturer Contact
marci stewart
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 86004
9285263030
MDR Report Key3776644
MDR Text Key4360266
Report Number2017233-2014-00220
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MLV
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P050006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/31/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/28/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-