• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37612
Device Problems Failure to Interrogate (1332); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Low Battery (2584); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problems Muscle Spasm(s) (1966); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Discomfort (2330); Neck Pain (2433); Neck Stiffness (2434)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had been unable to communicate with his device using his ¿controller¿.Earlier that day, the patient described a ¿shocking feeling¿ and ¿presumed¿, it was a static shock from being in contact with someone while they were removing their short.Other symptoms the patient experienced included pain and spasms in the left side of the neck.When the patient attempted to communicate with his device a few hours later, he saw the ¿poor communication¿ icon and then the patient¿s symptoms returned.The return of symptoms was described as stiffness in the neck.Communication with the clinician programmer was also not possible.An x-ray was performed and found to be ¿unremarkable¿.It was suspected that the device had overdischarged for the first time.A physician mode recharge (pmr) was attempted but was unsuccessful.The patient was reportedly given diazepam to ease the discomfort in the neck.Another pmr was going to be attempted over the weekend.If successful, impedance values were going to be measured prior to any intervention.Approximately two weeks later, it was reported that the overdischarge was confirmed.Per recharge efficacy information retrieved from the recharger, a successful recharge was performed the day prior to the event.Troubleshooting/intervention was going to be confirmed when the surgeon reviewed the patient.The reporter was awaiting news from the hospital.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis results were not available as of the date of this report.A follow-up report will be submitted when analysis is complete.
 
Event Description
Additional information reported that impedance testing and replacement was scheduled for six days after follow-up.Additional information reported that during surgery the top of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was exposed and the lead adapter was removed from channel 1.It was stated the lead adapter was then connected to an external neurostimulator (ens) with care being taken "to ensure the leads in the ins pocket weren't disturbed in case the short circuit was intermittent." it was further stated an impedance test was performed at that time and that "the impedances were all in the normal range with active contacts being 882 and 980 ohms." it was noted that because these values "weren't low enough for a short circuit," the patient's ins was replaced at that time.Upon reprogramming of the patient's ins, impedance measurements were taken and "all readings were within range." it was also reported that when the patient's original ins was completely flat, they remained unable to recharge the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: analysis of the implantable neurostimulator (ins) found ¿the ins was received with no telemetry and no output.A physician mode recharge (pmr) resulted in "invalid serial number" on the physician programmer and a 601 error code on the recharger.After several hours, the ins went back to no telemetry.Subsequent physician mode recharges produced the same result.The cause of this error was a copper trace anomaly that was observed on the exposed traces on the substrate of the hybrid's stacked chip scale package (scsp).The copper trace anomaly was between the traces for address (xa8) and voltage supply trace (vdig_2v).Mud cracking residue was also observed on several traces on the substrate of the stacked chip scale package (scsp).¿.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key3785121
MDR Text Key16224824
Report Number3004209178-2014-08389
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MRU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
H020007
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 04/10/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/28/2013
Device Model Number37612
Device Catalogue Number37612
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/16/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/20/2014
Initial Date FDA Received05/01/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
08/20/2014
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/29/2014
08/21/2014
09/14/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-