A manufacturing evaluation was completed: the instrument was analyzed for conformance to print specifications as well as the device history record was researched, no abnormal findings were identified.The view of the broken surfaces does not show any anomalies of materials structure, what indicates material conformity as well.The investigation of the complained instrument shows that a part of the tip is broken at the welding.Unfortunately we are not able to determine the exact cause which has led to this occurrence.It is likely that too much mechanical force had been applied during the surgery.No product fault could be detected.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|