It was reported that on (b)(6) 2013, an acculink stent was successfully implanted in the right internal carotid and the patient was discharged home the next day.On (b)(6) 2014, during a one year follow-up visit, the patient had increased velocities on the carotid duplex.Although the patient was asymptomatic, he was admitted to the hospital for in-stent restenosis.It was noted that the stent struts of the previously implanted acculink had collapsed.Another unspecified stent was placed in the right internal carotid artery.The in-stent restenosis resolved without sequela on (b)(6) 2014.There was no additional information provided.
|
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.It is indicated that the device is not returning for evaluation; therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported event.A query of the electronic complaint handling database revealed no other incidents for stent damage or restenosis reported from this lot.The reported patient effect of stenosis is a known observed and potential patient effect as listed in the instructions for use (ifu).Although a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency with respect to manufacturing, design or labeling.Based on the reviewed information, no product deficiency was identified.
|