Catalog Number 1012464-28 |
Device Problems
Deflation Problem (1149); Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Difficult to Remove (1528); Folded (2630)
|
Patient Problems
Angina (1710); Non specific EKG/ECG Changes (1817); Thrombosis (2100)
|
Event Date 04/30/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that prior to the procedure, the patient presented to the hospital with a left ventricular (lv) thrombus and strong left anterior descending (lad) coronary artery stenosis in the proximal lad, 80% with thrombotic material.The last third of the lad was fully closed by thrombotic material and the patient was also diagnosed with an st-elevated myocardial infarction (stemi).On (b)(6) 2014, an emergency percutaneous intervention was performed.During the procedure, antiplatelet medications were given and multiple thrombectomies were performed.After pre-dilatation, 30% stenosis was left.A 3.5x28mm drug eluting coronary device was implanted in the proximal lad.Post implantation, resistance was met upon delivery system removal from the scaffold.Once the delivery system was outside the anatomy, the balloon was noted to be partially inflated and did not properly refold.Per intra-vascular ultrasound (ivus), suboptimal wall apposition, of the implanted scaffold, was noted.Post dilatation was performed and the scaffold was fully apposed to the vessel wall, completing the procedure.Per ivus, 100% stenosis remained in the distal third of the lad.The patient was placed on antiplatelet medications.On (b)(6) 2014, the patient developed angina, and per electrocardiogram, st-elevation.A diagnostic angiogram was performed showing an in-scaffold thrombus.The scaffold remained well apposed to the vessel wall.The patient was re-wired and thrombus aspiration was performed multiple times.The patient also received thrombolytic medications.After aspirations, thrombotic material was still present, so a 3.5x28mm xience pro was successfully implanted, with good results.The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit and reportedly is currently in good condition and continuing antiplatelet medications.There was no additional information provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to the initial medwatch report, the following information was received: during the index procedure and after pre-dilatation, one third of the distal lad remained occluded.During the index procedure, post-dilatation of the implanted device, was performed using a 3.75x15mm non-abbott device.After post-dilatation, small amounts of residual thrombus remained at the scaffold site.After the procedure, the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit and reportedly, remains in good condition and is continuing antiplatelet medications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.Though the device is not approved for sale in the u.S., it uses a delivery system which is similar to a device sold in the u.S.The pma# listed is based on the predicate device (xience v stent system) that is determined to be same and similar to the delivery system of this device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported balloon refold issue was confirmed.The reported deflation issue was not confirmed.The reported difficulty to deploy and difficult to remove could not be replicated in a testing environment as they were based on operational circumstances.Based on the visual, dimensional and functional analysis of the device, there is no indication of a product deficiency.A cine file, sent with the case, was reviewed by an abbott vascular physician.The review confirmed that the device looked well apposed and expanded at the implant procedure.Pictures were not provided for the post procedure thrombosis.No device deficiencies were seen.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported event.A review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a manufacturing issue.The reported patient effects of angina and thrombosis, as listed in the device instructions for use (ifu), are known patient effects that may be associated with the use of the drug eluting coronary stent system in native coronary arteries.A review of the labels attached to the lot history record for this lot was conducted and the label review indicated that the use-by (expiration) date of the device was 03-january-2014.However, the device was implanted on (b)(6) 2014 which is approximately 4 months post expiration.It should be noted that the ifu instructs the physician to: note the product use-by (expiration) date on the package.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product deficiency.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|