• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC CASHMERE 14 - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC CASHMERE 14 - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CRC14061530
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Difficult To Position (1467)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 05/20/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The physician placed a cashmere coil (crc140615-30/c23927) into the internal carotid artery aneurysm through a non-codman microcatheter, by using the balloon remodeling technique (brand of balloon unknown).When he was pulling and pushing the coil into the target lesion several times, the coil unintentionally detached at the distal end of the microcatheter and was entirely and safely retrieved from the patient by using a gooseneck snare.The cashmere was replaced for a new product (crc140615-30, lot unknown) and the procedure was successfully completed using the same microcatheter without any further issues.There was no patient injury/complications reported, and the detachment did not result in disruption of blood flow.It is unknown how many coils were successfully placed into the target lesion before the complaint product, but it was reported that the cashmere had not become entangled with other coils and the detachment was not related to an interaction with the balloon catheter or microcatheter.A 1:1 relationship between the coil and delivery tube was verified with fluoroscopy prior to repositioning, and the microcatheter was not positioned at a sharp angle to the microcatheter.The microcatheter had not been reposition.The complaint product was new and was stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the ifu, and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.Prior to use, no defect (kink, bends etc) was noted on the product by visual inspection.Also no damages were reported on the device after the event.It is unknown if the microcatheter was re-shaped or not.The complaint product is unavailable for evaluation.No additional information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Information regarding patient age, weight, medical history and concomitant medications were not provided.Complaint conclusion: the physician placed a cashmere coil (crc140615-30/c23927) into the internal carotid artery aneurysm through a non-codman microcatheter, by using the balloon remodeling technique (brand of balloon unknown).When he was pulling and pushing the coil into the target lesion several times, the coil unintentionally detached at the distal end of the microcatheter and was entirely and safely retrieved from the patient by using a gooseneck snare.The cashmere was replaced for a new product (crc140615-30, lot unknown) and the procedure was successfully completed using the same microcatheter without any further issues.There was no patient injury/complications reported, and the detachment did not result in disruption of blood flow.It is unknown how many coils were successfully placed into the target lesion before the complaint product, but it was reported that the cashmere had not become entangled with other coils and the detachment was not related to an interaction with the balloon catheter or microcatheter.A 1:1 relationship between the coil and delivery tube was verified with fluoroscopy prior to repositioning, and the microcatheter was not positioned at a sharp angle to the microcatheter.The microcatheter had not been reposition.The complaint product was new and was stored per labeling instructions.The procedure was conducted in accordance with the ifu, and the constant flush had been maintained at all times.Prior to use, no defect (kink, bends etc) was noted on the product by visual inspection.Also no damages were reported on the device after the event.It is unknown if the microcatheter was re-shaped or not.No additional information is available.The complaint product is unavailable for evaluation.A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported complaint.The positioning difficulty and detachment could not be confirmed without return of the device for analysis.The root f the compliant could not be conclusively determined; however, the based on the information provided, the coil may have detached because it was caught with in the aneurysm or on the distal part of the microcatheter.There was no indication of a manufacturing issue related to the event; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.This is an initial/final mdr.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CASHMERE 14 - CERECYTE MICROCOIL
Type of Device
CNV DCS COILS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
duane durbin
miami lakes, FL 33014
MDR Report Key3865849
MDR Text Key4508063
Report Number1226348-2014-00121
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K072173
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/21/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/11/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/03/2018
Device Catalogue NumberCRC14061530
Device Lot NumberC23927
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/21/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/01/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-