|
Model Number M00516750 |
Device Problem
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/24/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex esophageal stent was used in the esophagus during a fistula closure procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014.According to the complainant, the physician deployed the stent to close the fistula and noticed that there were holes in the stent cover.The stent was removed and the procedure was completed with a different device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a wallflex esophageal stent was used in the esophagus during a fistula closure procedure performed on (b)(6) 2014.According to the complainant, the physician deployed the stent to close the fistula and noticed that there were holes in the stent cover.The stent was removed and the procedure was completed with a different device.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The complainant was unable to report the lot number; therefore, the manufacture date and expiration date are unknown.However, the complainant stated that the device was used prior to the expiration date.(b)(4).Although the suspect device has been received, the evaluation has not been completed.Therefore, the cause of the reported malfunction has not been determined.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A visual examination of the returned device found the stent was deployed and fully expanded.It was noted that 2 endoscopic clips, that are used to secure the stent in the patient during the procedure were attached to the stent at the suture end.Multiple slits / holes were noted throughout the stent cover, however these holes were all smaller than 1.0mm in diameter which is within specification.No other issues were noted with the profile of the stent.The investigation concluded that this complaint is associated with a product that meets specification however the user is dissatisfied with the function, performance or appearance of the product.Therefore, the most probable root cause classification user preference issue.A review of the device history record (dhr) confirmed that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.A labeling review was performed, and from the information available this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|