• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES BETTLACH IMPACTOR F/PFNA BLADE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES BETTLACH IMPACTOR F/PFNA BLADE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 356.823
Device Problem Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/02/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: while locking the blade, the distal portion of the impactor (colored portion) was loosened and detached from the remaining impactor.But the surgeon tried to lock the blade with the impactor through some other method which resulted in damage of the protection sleeve and drill sleeve.After the surgery, it was found that the drill sleeve is not completely inserting into the protection sleeve and it jams.This is report 1 of 3 for complaint (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.Device is an instrument and neither implanted nor explanted.Device is not distributed in the united states, but is similar to device marketed in the usa.No nonconformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned part was investigated.The tip of the impactor got bent then the end is completely broken off.The handle is also quite worn indicating it had been used a considerable number of times.The shaft also shows signs of a lot of wear and usage.It is also marked as a loan instrument which further points to it being used in a lot of surgeries.The technique guide was referenced and there is a note stating ¿do not use unnecessary force when inserting the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation blade¿.Based on the age (manufactured march 2009) and examination of the article we can state that this type of damage is from a combination of mishandling and wear and tear and there is no inherent product fault.The drill sleeve and protection sleeve were not returned for analysis but a review of the device history records confirm that these articles were manufactured in october and november 2011 meeting all specifications.We would like to point out that as per guide ¿if the pfna blade cannot be locked, remove it and replace it with a new pfna blade¿ but according to the complaint report, the surgeon used some other method (unknown) which resulted in breakage of protection and drill sleeve.A review of our complaints history for all of the above articles show there have been no other complaints from these article numbers and lot numbers.No product fault could be determined with returned article.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPACTOR F/PFNA BLADE
Type of Device
IMPACTOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach CH25 44
SZ  CH2544
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES BETTLACH
muracherstrasse 3
bettlach CH25 44
SZ   CH2544
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key3904646
MDR Text Key4675279
Report Number9612488-2014-10256
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HWA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/02/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/01/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number356.823
Device Lot Number2464372
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/22/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/22/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/20/2009
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-