Catalog Number 26-1221 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 06/10/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The device in question was used for the patient who was (b)(6) old female.During the operation, the surgeon found that the seal of the device came off.It is noted that no problem was found in pre-use inspection.Details will be informed as soon as (b)(6) receive them from the facility.(b)(4) 2014 additional questions have been asked to clarify what is meant by the "seal".It is our belief that they may be referring to the label.As a result according to the matrix the complaint would be reportable by serious injury as potential foreign body reaction, or medical intervention to prevent injury could have occured.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Upon completion of investigation, a follow up report will be filed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation of the perforators (2) revealed that 1 perforator is missing the label.There is evidence of adhesive residue and some label material here the label was affixed.The presence of the adhesive indicates that the label was affixed to this instrument at one time.The exact cause of removal of the label could not be verified; however, it appears that the label was pulled off the instrument purposely.It is likely that the label was lifted/pulled off of the instrument in the clinical setting; however, this could not be verified.The reported "the seal of the device came off" is associated with user misuse and is not attributed to manufacturing defects.These labels are securely affixed during the manufacturing process and inspected prior to placing perforator in inventory.The second perforator has the label securely attached, the edges are not lifted or show evidence of an attempt to remove the label.The lot code ag 012s is clearly visible on the label.There were no other anomalies noted on either instrument.The cutting surfaces appear to be free of nicks or dents.The device history records for this perforator were reviewed.All assembly process tests and inspection associated with the assembly process, met specification requirements.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time, this complaint is considered closed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information stated: on 7/16/2014: we have not received the additional information yet.Since we have received the device today, we will ask the rep for further information.Regarding the seal, yes, that refers to the label on attached to the sleeve of the device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It has been communicated that the device and/or lot information is not available for evaluation.Without the device and/or lot information it is not possible for codman to conduct a proper investigation.If at some point the device and/or lot information does become available, this complaint will be re-opened, evaluated and a follow up report will be filed.Trends will be monitored for this and similar complaints.At the present time this complaint is considered closed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|