• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Malposition of Device (2616); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Inadequate Instructions for Non-Healthcare Professional (2956)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Distress (2329)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient has had stimulation issues since implant.It was further reported that the stimulation was more in the left leg but it should be in the patient¿s right leg where their pain was.The patient reportedly felt stimulation in both legs but should have only been feeling it in the right leg.It was noted that the stimulation was shooting up their back into their leg.It was also noted that during the trial stimulation was in the right leg.The patient reportedly had meet with a manufacturer representative for programming but the stimulation was still not set right.The patient reportedly had to charge without being trained and noticed that their battery was getting low.The patient was reportedly charging with 6 bars but it was noted that the patient would lose the bars and have to readjust the antenna.It was further noted that the patient only charged to 50%.The patient reportedly was upset and felt like charging was overwhelming and did not realize they would have to do so much to do.It was further reported that the patient still had concerns but was working with their physician and/or company representative.It was further reported on 2014 (b)(6) that the patient did not have 50% or greater pain relief.The patient had some pain relief, but stimulation was stronger on opposite leg.The cause appeared to be due to lead placement being off and the patient was going to have a lead revision.Programming was not needed.The lead revision was being scheduled with a neurosurgeon.Additional information was requested, if received a follow up report will be sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product id 97740, serial# (b)(4); product type programmer, patient product id 97754, serial# (b)(4); product type recharger product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: 2014 (b)(6); product type lead product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: 2014 (b)(6); product type lead product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: 2014 (b)(6); product type lead product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: 2014 (b)(6); product type lead.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key3966643
MDR Text Key4634390
Report Number3004209178-2014-13671
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/23/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2014
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/23/2014
Initial Date FDA Received07/30/2014
Date Device Manufactured12/19/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00061 YR
-
-