Model Number ADVIA CHEMISTRY A1C_3 CALIBRATOR |
Device Problems
Nonstandard Device (1420); High Test Results (2457)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 04/07/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The customer has observed high patient bias on one patient sample for the a1c_3 assay on an advia 1800 instrument when using calibrator lot 3ld068.The patient sample was run on the advia 1800 instrument and then repeated twice on an alternate platform.The results obtained on the advia and the alternate platform were above the reference range set by the customer for the assay.The patient was then redrawn and the sample was sent to another site and run on another alternate platform and the result was lower.There were no reports of patient intervention or adverse health consequences due to the high bias observed on the one patient sample for the a1c_3 assay.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Siemens has confirmed that the advia chemistry systems a1c_3 method may exhibit a percent bias of -9% to +11% for hemoglobin (hb)a1c samples when using a1c_3 calibrator lots 3hd044 and 3ld068.Depending on quality control limits, this issue may not have been detected.An urgent medical device recall (umdr) 10819262, rev.A was sent to us customers and an urgent field safety notice (ufsn) 10819261, rev.A was sent to ous customers in august of 2014.The umdr and ufsn state that customers are requested to discontinue use of and discard the calibrator lots listed, and to review the physician's letter sent along with the umdr and ufsn with their medical director.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The original mdr 2432235-2014-00435 was filed on august 7, 2014.Corrected information (08/25/14):section updated with the correct 510k number k081895.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The original mdr 2432235-2014-00435 was filed on august 7, 2014.The first follow up report was filed on september 3, 2014.Additional information (12/19/14): final root cause: bias in patient sample and (b)(4) survey performance was not detected due to the insensitivity in the calibrator and reagent testing control system.The overall capability (error budget) of a1c_3 method was not sufficient to consistently provide clinically acceptable results across all reagent and calibrator lots.A key component of the error budget is the manufacturing controls system for assignment of the calibrator bottle values where the inaccuracy of this process is due to lack of statistical power.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|