The autopulse platform (s/n (b)(4)) was returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Visual inspection of the returned platform shows that the top cover, encoder cover, motor cover, head restraint brackets, restraint pin assembly, and the battery compartment were damaged.In addition, the battery partition cover was missing.The physical damages found during visual inspection are not related to the reported complaint that the platform had no power.The damages appear to have been caused by user mishandling (i.E.Dropping the platform).A review of the autopulse archive was performed and the reported complaint was not confirmed.The archive data shows that no clinical event with a patient occurred on the reported event date of (b)(6) 2014.Functional testing was performed and the reported issue could not be reproduced.The platform was able to power on and off many times with no problems.The platform also ran for 15 minutes with the test mannequin and 7 minutes with a large resuscitation test fixture (lrtf) without a fault.During testing, it was also observed that one of the load cells was not functioning properly.However, this is not related to the reported complaint.Based on the investigation, the parts identified for replacement were the top cover, battery partition cover, motor cover, encoder cover, head restraint brackets, restraint pin assembly, load cell module and the battery compartment.In summary, the reported complaint was not confirmed based on the archive review and during functional testing.The physical damages found during visual inspection are unrelated to the reported complaint.Upon replacement of all damaged parts, the platform was re-evaluated through functional testing and the platform passed all testing criteria.
|