Specific patient information with regard to age and weight was not provided by the doctor.The doctor was not definitive as to whether flow-it alc had been used to initially cement the veneer; however, after it had debonded the first time, he used flow-it alc and a competitors bonding agent to re-cement the restoration.The veneer debonded a second time; therefore, the doctor took a new impression and a new veneer was made.The new veneer was cemented using a new syringe of flow-it alc, without further incident.To date, the patient is doing fine.The product involved in the alleged incident was not returned and no lot number was provided; therefore, no evaluation can be conducted.
|