According to the event description, the component which dislocated is the humeral head.The check of it s work cycle did not show any dimensional anomaly; a total of 60 humeral heads have been manufactured with the lot # 201311363, and we did not received any other signaling on this lot #.We know that the explants are not available for investigation; we have requested to the complaint source further information on the event (e.G., x-rays, confirmation that the prosthetic components were well fixed on each other at the time of revision), but we received confirmation that no further info is available; therefore we could not perform a deeper investigation, and understand how much the implantation technique or patient condition could have contributed to the early dislocation.Based on our analysis with the poor info provided, we believe that the device could perform well, and that the reason for the shoulder dislocation is not related to the humeral head itself.This is the (b)(4) case of reported shoulder instability/dislocation with a smr anatomic total prosthesis.By the events information and out analysis, only 2 of these cases can be mainly attributed to the product; for all the others a patient trauma, condition or pathology (e.G.Rotator cuff failure), sometimes combined with an improper surgical technique by the surgeon during the original surgery, significantly contributed to the incident.By our post-market surveillance data, a total of about (b)(4) smr anatomic total prostheses were implanted worldwide since 2002.Therefore the total revision rate due to smr anatomic total instability/dislocation is 0.17% while the revision rate "product related" due to smr anatomic total instability dislocation is 0.02%.
|