It was reported that the patient ¿had not a great deal of success¿ with the device and was admitted to the hospital due to exacerbation of symptoms of gastroparesis.An endoscopy and exploratory laparotomy were performed; it was discovered that one of the leads penetrated through the wall of the stomach.Surgery was performed to repair the lead where ¿there appeared to be a great deal more adhesions.¿ the lead reportedly had ¿yellow staining consistent with bile leak¿ and there was ¿abdominal contamination by gastric contents.¿ it was noted that laboratory analysis determined that the substance was candida (torulopsis) glabrata.The leads were not connected to the wall of the stomach and they were not connected ¿as it was set up originally in the operating room,¿ so they were both removed.It was noted that there was ¿clearly a gastrotomy where it went into the stomach.¿ due to the suspected infection of the pocket, the leads were not replaced at the time and the abdomen was ¿copiously irrigated with antibiotic containing solution.¿ it was noted that a bile film was left in the abdomen to help prevent adhesions.The patient reportedly was discharged from the hospital on (b)(6) 2004 and recovered.It was later clarified that the lead penetrated through the wall of the stomach and that there was erosion of previously placed lead into the stomach, but the lead had not perforated the abdominal wall and no major infection was involved in the pocket as suspected.It was noted that the patient wanted to have the leads replaced later on.Additional information was requested.
|