• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC DELTAPLUSH - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC DELTAPLUSH - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CPL10015230
Device Problem Impedance Problem (2950)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/16/2011
Event Type  No Answer Provided  
Event Description
The complaint received states that the deltaplush cerecyte microcoil 1.5 mm x 2 cm (cpl10015230 / g11357) had resistance/friction resulting in loss of target lesion with the microcatheter.There was strong resistance in the mc when the coil was inserted into it.During the coil advancement; there was a feeling that the mc was pushed back.The tip of the mc ended up with coming out from the aneurysm.The procedure was ended removing the mc and the coil safely.Before this defective; other four or five coils (including one micrus: cpl100203) were deployed with no problem.There is no report of injury to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This mdr is being submitted as part of retrospective review as a result of a recent fda audit and with accordance to the requirements of code of federal regulations ¿ 21 cfr part 803, medical device reporting.Cc: the complaint received states that the deltaplush cerecyte microcoil 1.5 mm x 2 cm (cpl10015230 / g11357) had resistance/friction resulting in loss of target lesion with the microcatheter.There was strong resistance in the mc when the coil was inserted into it.During the coil advancement; there was a feeling that the mc was pushed back.The tip of the mc ended up with coming out from the aneurysm.The procedure was ended removing the mc and the coil safely.Before this defective; other four or five coils (including one micrus: cpl100203) were deployed with no problem.There is no report of injury to the patient.The coil was returned severely damaged.The evidence from the damaged coil suggests that detached interference inside the microcatheter may have caused the resistance felt during coil advancement.This type of interference was most likely to have been in the form of a blood; protein; and contrast mixture.However; the exact source of this interference cannot be determined as the microcatheter and coil were returned cleaned.Concerning the microcatheter coming out of the aneurysm; it is more likely due to detached interference inside the microcatheter.This may have contributed to the kickback to occur.However; the exact source of this interference cannot be determined.The echelon 14 microcatheter passed inspection and functionality tested.Therefore; it is highly unlikely that this microcatheter; by itself; contributed to the complaint event.For optimum product performance and to prevent potential complications; the instructions for use (ifu) recommends; ¿if unusual friction is still noticed during advancement or retraction of the microcoil system; verify flush lines are open and properly pressurized.Then slowly withdraw the entire micrus microcoil system and examine for damage.Replace it with a new microcoil system.If friction still exists; withdraw and examine the delivery catheter system.¿ to achieve optimal performance of the micrus microcoil system; it is important that a continuous infusion of an appropriate flush solution be maintained.Figure 2 illustrates the connections necessary for the micrus microcoil delivery system including a typical continuous saline flush set up with pressure bag for the catheter systems.¿ the complaint of resistance/friction was confirmed on analysis.100% inspections are in place to prevent damaged products from leaving the facility and the dhr review confirmed that the product met specifications.No corrective action is required at this time.Review of the information suggests that procedural issues may have contributed to the reported and confirmed events.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DELTAPLUSH - CERECYTE MICROCOIL
Type of Device
CNV DCS COILS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC (SAN JOSE)
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
duane durbin
miami lakes, FL 33014
5088283106
MDR Report Key4056777
MDR Text Key4904614
Report Number1226348-2014-00263
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K083646
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/18/2011
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/17/2015
Device Catalogue NumberCPL10015230
Device Lot NumberG11357
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/18/2011
Initial Date FDA Received09/03/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNK ECHELON 14 MICROCATHETER
-
-