• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC PRESIDIO 10 - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC PRESIDIO 10 - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number PC410041230
Device Problem Impedance Problem (2950)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 03/23/2011
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
There was resistance when the coil was pushed out from the introducer sheath.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This mdr is being submitted as part of retrospective review as a result of a recent fda audit and with accordance to the requirements of code of federal regulations ¿ 21 cfr part 803, medical device reporting.Cc: the complaint received states that a presidio 10 cerecyte microcoil 4 mm x 11.5 cm (pc410041230 / j10342) had resistance/friction in the microcoil and had severe damaged when removed from the patient.There was resistance when the coil was pushed out from the introducer sheath.There is no report of injury for the patient.The proximal end of the coil has been severely damaged.The protrusion of the device positioning unit (dpu) out of the sheath was most likely the result of distal interference.The most likely root cause of the coil¿s resistance was due to a blockage of a blood; tissue; and contrast mixture.For optimum product performance; the instructions for use (ifu) recommends; ¿to achieve optimal performance of the micrus microcoil system; it is important that a continuous infusion of an appropriate flush solution be maintained.Figure 2 illustrates the connections necessary for the micrus microcoil delivery system including a typical continuous saline flush set up with pressure bag for the catheter systems.If unusual friction is still noticed during advancement or retraction of the microcoil system; verify flush lines are open and properly pressurized.Then slowly withdraw the entire micrus microcoil system and examine for damage.Replace it with a new microcoil system.If friction still exists; withdraw and examine the delivery catheter system.¿in addition; without the return of the sl-10 microcatheter and the hemostatic valve used in the procedure; it cannot be determined what extent; if any; that these components may have contributed to the complaint event.The complaint was confirmed on analysis.One hundred % inspections are in place to prevent damaged products from leaving the facility and the dhr review confirmed that the product met specifications.No corrective action is required at this time.Review of the available information suggests that procedural issues may have contributed to the confirmed events.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PRESIDIO 10 - CERECYTE MICROCOIL
Type of Device
CNV DCS COILS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC (SAN JOSE)
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
duane durbin
miami lakes, FL 33014
5088283106
MDR Report Key4056930
MDR Text Key4731938
Report Number1226348-2014-00276
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K002056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/23/2011
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/03/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/03/2016
Device Catalogue NumberPC410041230
Device Lot NumberJ10342
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/23/2011
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/01/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-