• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC DELTAPLUSH - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC DELTAPLUSH - CERECYTE MICROCOIL; CNV DCS COILS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CPL10020630
Device Problems Knotted (1340); Stretched (1601)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/10/2012
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
During embolization of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm two deltaplush coils failed to advance inside the introducer sheath after being resheathed because, the microcatheter came out from the aneurysm.Failure analysis found that the returned deltaplush coil (cpl10020630/g15042) coil was stretched and the returned deltaplush coil (cpl10015330/g14367) was kinked.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The unit was returned cleaned with the dpu separated from the sheath.The coil was returned unsheathed and unprotected.The dpu and sheath were returned separated from each other.In order for this to occur, the coil had to have been retracted through the resheathing tool.When this occurs severe damage may have been done to the coil.The coil was returned severely damaged.The proximal end of the coil exhibits compression and stretching.The coil was knotted in two separate sections which caused severe damage.Tissue was found lodged into the coil.The coil was returned severely damaged.The evidence suggests that distal interference contributed to the coils resistance and for the microcatheter to have moved out of the aneurysm.This interference may have been in the form of detached debris (protein) found lodged into the coil¿s primary winding.In addition; without the return of the prowler lpes microcatheter and the rotating hemostatic valve (rhv) used in the procedure; it cannot be determined if these components contributed to the complaint event.If detached debris was a contributing factor; then for optimum product performance; the instructions for use (ifu) recommends; ¿to achieve optimal performance of the micrus microcoil system; it is important that a continuous infusion of an appropriate flush solution be maintained.Figure 2 illustrates the connections necessary for the micrus microcoil delivery system including a typical continuous saline flush set up with pressure bag for the catheter systems.¿ although a definitive conclusion cannot be made, based on the analysis, it appears that interference in the microcatheter was the primary cause of the event.Additionally, review of this lot presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported complaint.Therefore, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DELTAPLUSH - CERECYTE MICROCOIL
Type of Device
CNV DCS COILS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR, LLC
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC (SAN JOSE)
821 fox lane
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
duane durbin
miami lakes, FL 33014
5088283106
MDR Report Key4087649
MDR Text Key4739797
Report Number1226348-2014-00641
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
K083646
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/10/2012
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/09/2016
Device Catalogue NumberCPL10020630
Device Lot NumberG15042
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/14/2012
Initial Date FDA Received09/13/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/01/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-