This is submitted to report that resistance noted with the steerable guide catheter (sgc 10316565/16) during removal of the clip delivery system.Additionally, bubbles were observed in the sgc, and the tip was torn, which are issues that have the potential to cause or contribute to patient injury.It was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat degenerative mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 3-4.It was noted that there was unusual axis of the heart.The steerable guiding catheter (sgc 10316565/16) and clip delivery system (cds 10333715/13) were advanced to the mitral valve without issue.While using the m-knob in the left atrium (la), the clip moved in the opposite direction to the valve, and was retracted.Resistance was noted while retracting the clip into the clip introducer, although the clip was fully closed, and the blue lip of introducer became compressed.The sgc was replaced because bubbles were observed in the system while retracting the clip, and it was thought that the tip of the sgc was torn.A new cds was used with a new sgc and the procedure was completed with the implantation of one clip, reducing the mr to <1.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4) - failure to follow steps evaluation summary: the incident information provided to abbott vascular, the manufacturing records/complaint history and the analysis of the returned product were reviewed.The steerable guiding catheter (sgc) soft tip was inspected and was torn.A small portion of the tip material was detached.The difficulty removing the clip delivery system (cds) from the sgc and reported leak could not be confirmed via returned device analysis.In this case, although the analysis was unable to confirm the reported leak and the difficulty removing the cds from the sgc, the discrepancy between what was reported and what was observed (no leaks identified and clip not getting caught on the soft tip) was likely due to the steps utilized by the account to remove the cds from the sgc.With regards to the reported soft tip tear, potential causes for difficulty retracting the cds into the guide tip, resulting in soft tip tear/damage can be caused by, but are not limited to, manufacturing anomalies (inner diameter [id] of the tip not within specification), user technique or procedural conditions (curves on the guide during cds removal).With respect to the procedural conditions and/or user technique, clip getting caught on guide resulting in soft tip tears can be influenced by the orientation of the clip with respect to the guide tip or curves on the sgc applied by the user.Based on the information reviewed and analysis of the returned device, the difficulty removing the cds from the sgc was due to the sgc being in neutral, and not straightened upon removal of the cds.This then resulted in the clip becoming caught on the soft tip, causing the soft tip tears.It should be noted that the mitraclip instructions for use (ifu) instructs the user to straighten the guide tip before cds removal.Based on the information reviewed and the analysis of the returned devices, the soft tip damage (tears/detachment) appears to be related to the clip getting caught on the guide tip and thus user technique/procedural conditions as the sgc soft tip was not straightened.There is no evidence of a product quality deficiency associated with the guide.A review of the device history record revealed no non-conformances for the lot.Additionally, a review of the complaint-handling database identified no other incidents reported for sgc tears and/or sgc leak for the lot.Based on the information reviewed, there is no indication of a product deficiency.
|