• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 82090-01
Device Problems Difficult or Delayed Positioning (1157); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 09/08/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a right carotid artery.Physician thought the delivery sheath looked different than normal but decided to use the device anyway.A non-abbott protection device was advanced to the lesion; however, when advancing through a 6f sheath there was a lot of drag felt.When attempting to deploy the stent, the deployment actuator would not turn.The stent deployed slightly, but did not flower so the stent was pulled back into the sheath.An attempt was made to remove the stent delivery system; however, it pulled all the devices with it and the stent dislodged and got stuck in the access sheath.A cutdown at the access site was made and vessel loops were used to maintain hemostasis.A new access sheath was advanced and a non-abbott protection device and same size xact were successfully used to complete the procedure.There was a clinically significant delay in the procedure as it took over to hours to complete.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The stent dislodgement was able to be confirmed.The failure to deploy was not able to be confirmed as the stent was not returned.Based on a visual and functional inspection of the returned device, there is no indication of a product deficiency.A review of the lot history record revealed no non-conformances that would have contributed to the reported event.A query of the complaint handling database revealed no other similar incidents reported from this lot.Based on the reviewed information, no product deficiency was identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XACT CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, TEMECULA, CA USA REG# 2024168
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 462
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key4141086
MDR Text Key15913170
Report Number2024168-2014-06428
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040038
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/08/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2016
Device Catalogue Number82090-01
Device Lot Number3090461
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/10/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/08/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/03/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
-
-