• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF) Back to Search Results
Model Number 97714
Device Problems Break (1069); Unintended Collision (1429)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 03/14/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that while riding a horse, the patient had an accident in (b)(6) 2014 in which he fractured 3 of his vertebrae.The patient was unsure of the date but stated that it was around (b)(6) 2014.After the accident, the patient got up from the ground and rode two more horses before he was not able to get up from his knees.The patient noted that he felt too weak to move and had to go into the hospital that night.An mri was done on (b)(6) 2014 when they did the spine lumbar without contrast.The patient stated that the report noted post-operative changes at the interior and posterior fusion with decompressive laminectomy present at the l4-l5.The spine stimulator catheter was present and the vertebrae alignment was normal.The transverse process fracture was present on the left at l3-l4 levels.No other fractures were identified and no evidence of channel or form of stenosis.The patient went and got the medical record because he did not believe that he had truly broken anything.The patient was given prescriptions for pain pills but never filled them.The patient stated that the pain was not very bad and that he was walking around the next morning and really did not think it was that bad of a deal.In a couple of weeks, the patient was not back riding the horses but was driving the truck feeding the cows and doing a lot of craw fishing.It was noted that the patient did not get back on the horse until the third week in (b)(6).About a month after the accident, the patient tried to ride a horse but after 10 minutes, he knew it was too soon.It was verified that the leads and implantable neurostimulator were working correctly.The patient stated that the machine was ¿totally awesome¿ when it was working correctly.The patient noted that prior to the fall the system was covering the pain well.After the fall, the patient had to have reprogramming done to cover the pain like it was before.The patient was reprogrammed in (b)(6) and then it was ¿stupid great.¿ the patient reported feeling excellent stimulation where he needed it.Impedances were all normal during that time.It was noted that the patient did not say that his fall in march had anything to do with the device.It was later reported that the health care professional told the patient there was no way the leads could not have been damaged with the fall and that they must be damaged due to the fall.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant products: product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead; product id 97740, serial# (b)(4), product type programmer, patient; product id 97754, serial# (b)(4), product type recharger; product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead; product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead; product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead; product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead; product id 977a260, serial# (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type lead.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The patient reported they broke as many as 13 bones throughout the back and was in the hospital and therapy for over a month.The indication for therapy was spinal pain.If additional information is received, a supplemental report will be sent.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Disregard reg report 3004209178-2014-19688 - supplemental issued on 11-23-2015.The rationale as a malfunction and not a serious injury remains.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, IMPLANTED (PAIN RELIEF)
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
ceiba norte industrial park, r
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
diane wolf
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263987
MDR Report Key4171283
MDR Text Key5157666
Report Number3004209178-2014-19688
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/02/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/14/2014
Device Model Number97714
Device Catalogue Number97714
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/02/2014
Initial Date FDA Received10/14/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/23/2015
11/24/2015
Date Device Manufactured07/16/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age00047 YR
-
-