• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 305U223
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Gradient Increase (1270); Occlusion Within Device (1423); Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
Patient Problems Chest Pain (1776); Dyspnea (1816)
Event Date 09/04/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the analysis observation, it appears that the valve may have been distorted during implant, which created localized stress during the closure on the commissures and caused leaflet misalignment.The leaflet misalignment then created a space (pocket) for blood accumulation (thrombus).Histopathology confirmed thrombus and calcification.A review of the device history record was also performed for this valve.The device was manufactured per approved and released manufacturing processes and the device met all applicable manufacturing specifications prior to release for distribution.The high gradient was most likely caused by the valve distortion, which could lead to insufficient effective orifice area, an immobile leaflet, and compromised forward flow.Exactly when and how the distortion occurred cannot be determined; however per manufacturing procedures, each mosaic valve is inspected for distortion and this valve passed the inspection prior to release for distribution.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that high gradients, aortic stenosis and trace regurgitation were observed via echocardiogram during the patient¿s six-month post-implant follow-up.One month later, the physician elected to explant the device due to the patient being symptomatic with dyspnea, chest pain and occasional arm/shoulder pain.Upon explant, two of the valve cusps were largely immobile, with what appeared to be calcification extending from the cusps to the device base.No subsequent adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the initial visual observation noted that the valve was distorted in an oval shape.A leaflet appeared to have been cut or torn.The sewing ring appeared to have been removed during explant, exposing part of the stent.A metal-like pledget remained crimped to a green multifilament suture on the outflow adjacent to the non-coronary left stent post.All existing leaflets were slightly stiff but flexible, except where host tissue and/or mineralization extended on the outflow.A section of the left cusp appeared to have been excised for histopathology sampling.A small tear or puncture through the tunica of the non-coronary cusp along the inflow margin of attachment appeared to be associated with the removal of host tissue during explant.The non-coronary left and left-right commissures were intact.Cuts and/or tears observed on the right non-coronary commissure appeared to have occurred during explant.A remnant of glistening off-white pannus remained attached to the inflow margin of attachment adjacent to the left-right inferior coaptive area.Pannus remained attached to the outflow rail adjacent to all cusps extending to both the non-coronary left and left-right stent posts.An unknown amount of pannus appeared to have been removed on the inflow and outflow during explant.Tan thrombotic-appearing host tissue filled and stiffened the non-coronary cusp on the outflow with remnants lining the right cusp and existing left cusp.Radiography showed trace mineralization in all cusps.Histopathological examination of the returned valve showed moderate to severe extrinsic calcification of the left coronary cusp, and mild multi-focal extrinsic calcification of the right coronary and non-coronary cusps.There was minute focal intrinsic calcification of the left coronary leaflet.Thrombus was observed on the outflow surface of all leaflets.There was no evidence of infection in the examined samples.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been returned and analysis is in progress.Upon completion of analysis, a supplemental report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOSAIC AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4190600
MDR Text Key12710381
Report Number2025587-2014-00778
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P990064
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative,company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/01/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/21/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/10/2018
Device Model Number305U223
Device Catalogue Number305U223
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/11/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/01/2014
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/30/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age00055 YR
-
-