• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 995
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Structural Problem (2506)
Patient Problems Death (1802); Pulmonary Insufficiency (2022); Pulmonary Valve Stenosis (2024); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 07/19/2010
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
Medtronic received information from a retrospective study in the annals of thoracic surgery; (b)(6) 2011; 91:188¿94, that summarized the 20-year experience of the rastelli procedure to treat transposition of the great arteries (tga) and pulmonary stenosis (ps) in pediatric patients.Between 1988 and 2008, 40 patients underwent ro (median age 4 years; range 9 months to 17 years; 24 male, 16 female).The right ventricular outflow tract (rvot) was obstructed in 32 and atretic in 8 patients.The right ventricular (rv) to pulmonary artery (pa) was reconstructed with a homograft (n=25), contegra bovine jugular vein conduit (n=8), polyethylene terephthalate fiber nonvalved graft conduit (n=5) or freestyle porcine valved root (n=2).The mean size of the rv-pa conduit was 17.3 plus or minus 2.33 mm (range 13 to 22 mm).Within a mean follow-up of 8.6 years, there was: 1) one early reoperation for bleeding.No adverse patient effects were reported.2) permanent pacemakers were implanted post-operatively in 5 patients for permanent atrio-ventricular (av) block (n=2) complete av block (n=2), and sick sinus syndrome (n=1).No further adverse patient effects were reported.3) there were 3 late deaths and one cardiac transplantation.The first death occurred in a patient with coronary artery anomaly (rv branches arising from the left coronary artery) who died suddenly 1 year postoperatively.This patient had documented sinus rhythm and no obstruction.The second death presented with multiple stenoses of the peripheral and central pulmonary arteries and klippel-feil syndrome, with multiple skeletal and rib anomalies.The patient died of low cardiac output 3 months after the ro.The third death was in a patient with a myelomeningocele who expired at another hospital 6 months after ro secondary to pneumonia and sepsis.A fourth patient underwent two reinterventions for pacemaker exchange due to complete atrioventricular block.Before cardiac transplantation (12 years after ro), he presented with severely impaired right and left ventricular function with end-stage heart failure and ejection fraction of 15%.4) sixteen patients had reoperation for rv-pa conduit stenosis (mean 7.8 plus or minus 3.8 years) without mortality.Two patients required reoperation for left ventricular outflow tract (lvot) obstruction due to scar formation within the baffle pathway from the ventricular septal defect (vsd) to the aortic valve.The average time to conduit failure was 7.8 plus or minus 3.8 years (range 2 to 16 years).The mean age at reoperation was 12 plus or minus 6 years (range 4 to 27 years).The peak systolic gradient across the rvot before conduit replacement was 59 plus or minus 8 mm hg (range 30 to 80 mmhg).The most common indication for conduit replacement was stenosis, which was present in 14 of the 16 replacement procedures.A less frequent primary indication for conduit replacement was conduit valve insufficiency, noted in 2 patients.All conduits that required replacement had varying degrees of insufficiency (mild=6, moderate=8, severe=2).Thirteen patients underwent replacement with a second biologic valve, while 3 had the conduit revised with the insertion of a polytetrafluroethylene monocusp valve.Of the 18 patients who did not require reoperation, freedom from lvot obstruction or aortic insufficiency was 89% and 95%, respectively.One patient had a 22 mmhg lvot obstruction gradient, and another had mild aortic insufficiency.Two patients presented with moderate stenosis of the conduit (41 and 47 mmhg); no treatment was prescribed and no adverse patient effects were reported.At last follow-up, sinus rhythm with complete right bundle branch block (rbbb) was present in 31 patients.It is unknown if a medtronic product was related to the reported deaths, reoperations or pacemaker implantations.The date of death(s) is an approximate date based on day of the completion of the study.The age and weight of the patient(s) is the mean.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Multiple attempts to obtain additional information regarding the products in the article were unsuccessful.Without the return of the product(s), no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation(s).(b)(4).Citation: title:"rastelli operation for transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis" authors: john w.Brown, md, mark ruzmetov, md, phd, daniel huynh, bs, mark d.Rodefeld, md, mark w.Turrentine, md, and andrew c.Fiore, md section of cardiothoracic surgery, indiana university school of medicine, indianapolis, indiana; and st.Louis university school of medicine, st.Louis, missouri the annals of thoracic surgery; 2011;91:188¿94.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4200998
MDR Text Key17991176
Report Number2025587-2014-00790
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/29/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/27/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number995
Device Catalogue Number995
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/29/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Required Intervention;
Patient Age00004 YR
Patient Weight23
-
-