• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 995
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Structural Problem (2506); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Aortic Regurgitation (1716); Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Fibrosis (3167)
Event Date 03/23/2006
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
To date, no additional information has been received from an author of the article.Based on the limited information received, a root cause of the complaints cannot be determined.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: literature article.No product available for analysis.Conclusion: the device history record (dhr) could not be reviewed as no serial numbers were provided.Per the author, the study determined the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis showed freedom from structural valve deterioration was 95.8% at ten years.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information from a journal article entitled structural deterioration of the freestyle aortic valve: mode of presentation and mechanisms, featured in the journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery (doi:10.1016/j.Jtcvs.2006.03.056).The article evaluated the mechanisms and clinical presentation of structural valve dysfunction (svd) in the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis.The study included 608 patients who received a freestyle valve, 475 implanted via subcoronary and 133 implanted via root replacement, between january 1993 and august 2004.Twenty-seven patients required reoperation or explant, twelve of whom showed evidence of structural valve dysfunction (svd) diagnosis.Four of the explants were due to technical issues.An additional eleven explants were due to late technical issues.Of the eleven technical issues, three explants were due to severe mismatch, two explants were due to endocarditis, three explants were due to paravalvular leak, two explants were due to partial dehiscence of root replacement, and one explant was due to central regurgitation.Per the author, the study determined the freestyle stentless bioprosthesis showed freedom from structural valve deterioration was 95.8% at ten years.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FREESTYLE AORTIC ROOT BIOPROSTHESIS
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4226911
MDR Text Key12598029
Report Number2025587-2014-00839
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P970031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/24/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number995
Device Catalogue Number995
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/24/2014
Initial Date FDA Received11/05/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
11/24/2014
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/27/2014
09/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00068 YR
-
-