• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: HEMOSPHERE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

HEMOSPHERE, INC. HERO GRAFT; VASCULAR GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number HERO 1001
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Death (1802)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
According to the report by (b)(4), of cryolife's hero distributor (b)(4), on the (b)(6) association of nephrology nurses and technologists (cannt) meeting in (b)(6): (b)(6) presented on hero graft and their experience with 14 patients.6 of their 14 patients still have hero graft (7 deceased and 1 removed; 2 cited as graft related).They are very happy with the performance of hero graft (all implanted using flixene), but stress that the device is not a cure and patients should be carefully selected. as it is unknown if either the hero 1001 or hero 1002 contributed to the reported event, out of caution, it was decided to investigate both.This medwatch is for hero 1001 component.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This investigation is currently ongoing.Furthermore, this report reflects the event as alleged by the complainant and does not imply that the information reported to cryolife is accurate or has been confirmed by cryolife.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
According to the report by the distributor during the (b)(6): representatives from (b)(6) presented on hero graft and their experience with 14 patients.6 of their 14 patients still have hero graft (7 deceased and 1 removed; 2 cited as graft related).They are very happy with the performance of hero graft (all implanted using flixene), but stress that the device is not a cure and patients should be carefully selected. as it is unknown if either the hero 1001 or hero 1002 contributed to the reported event, out of caution, it was decided to investigate both.This medwatch is for hero 1001 component.The following additional information was received on 12/11/2014: "the patient had the graft explanted due to steal syndrome.As such the integrity of the product was not in question." the vascular access coordinator had discussed this with the surgeon and he is in agreement that this case should not be considered a graft related event.Additional information was received from the complainant on 02/03/2015 and the complaint was re-opened at that time.The additional information is still under investigation.This investigation is currently ongoing.Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
 
Event Description
According to the report by (b)(6), of cryolife's hero distributor sorin, on the (b)(6) meeting in (b)(6): (b)(6) and (b)(6), from (b)(6) presented on hero graft and their experience with 14 patients.6 of their 14 patients still have hero graft (7 deceased and 1 removed; 2 cited as graft related).They are very happy with the performance of hero graft (all implanted using flixene), but stress that the device is not a cure and patients should be carefully selected.It was initially unknown which component of the hero device attributed to the alleged event thus reports were submitted for both components.This medwatch is for the hero 1001 component.Based on the additional information received it was determined that the hero 1001 component could not have attributed to the adverse event.Thus this is the final report submitted for hero 1001.͊ additional information was received on 02/03/2015 from the hospital.The hospital stated: "the hero graft was inserted on (b)(6).She was admitted post-operatively for observation and dialysis.On post-operative day 1, her blood pressure remained very low in the 80s-90s mm hg systolic and as such the graft occluded and she was brought back emergently to the o.R.For thrombectomy.This was successful but within a few hours she developed severe vascular ischemic steal in her left hand and had to be returned to the or that same night for explantation of the hero graft and replacement with a new left internal jugular catheter." the patients comorbidities were as follows: hypertension, impaired glucose tolerance, membranous glomerulonephropathy, multiple failed av fistulas, nephrectomy 2014, peritoneal dialysis peritonitis, previous failed renal transplant, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
According to the report by the distributor during the (b)(6): representatives from (b)(6) presented on hero graft and their experience with 14 patients.6 of their 14 patients still have hero graft (7 deceased and 1 removed; 2 cited as graft related).They are very happy with the performance of hero graft (all implanted using flixene), but stress that the device is not a cure and patients should be carefully selected. as it is unknown if either the hero 1001 or hero 1002 contributed to the reported event, out of caution, it was decided to investigate both.This medwatch is for hero 1001 component.The following additional information was received on 12/11/2014: "the patient had the graft explanted due to steal syndrome.As such the integrity of the product was not in question." the vascular access coordinator had discussed this with the surgeon and he is in agreement that this case should not be considered a graft related event.A review was performed of the available information, the instructions for use (ifu) lists vascular insufficiency due to steal syndrome as a potential complication that ranges from 2.6% to 3.8% with hero and 3.8% in arteriovenous graft (avg).Steal syndrome is a known complication of the hero device cause shunting of arterial blood into the venous system.Steal syndrome is not unique to hero graft and is a well-known complication of hemodialysis conduits and may be managed by ligation or explant.According to the information provided, all of the patients had procedure modification to include flixene graft attached to a small portion of arterial graft component.This is a modification to the device, so cryolife cannot support this modification as it is not an approved indication/modification to the device.The ifu provides adequate instructions to implant the graft in the approved configuration but no allowance is made for off label use.Clinical outcomes with a modified device have not been evaluated by cryolife.
 
Event Description
According to the report by (b)(6), of cryolife's hero distributor (b)(4), on (b)(6) meeting in (b)(6) presented on hero graft and their experience with 14 patients.6 of their 14 patients still have hero graft (7 deceased and 1 removed; 2 cited as graft related).They are very happy with the performance of hero graft (all implanted using flixene), but stress that the device is not a cure and patients should be carefully selected.It is unknown if either the hero 1001 or hero 1002 contributed to the reported event, out of caution, it was decided to investigate both.This medwatch is for hero 1001 component.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HERO GRAFT
Type of Device
VASCULAR GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
HEMOSPHERE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd. nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer (Section G)
HEMOSPHERE, INC.
1655 roberts blvd. nw
kennesaw GA 30144
Manufacturer Contact
sandra o'reilly
1655 roberts blvd., nw
kennesaw, GA 30144
7704193355
MDR Report Key4238947
MDR Text Key5019110
Report Number3006945290-2014-00090
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K121532
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/27/2014
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberHERO 1001
Device Lot NumberH14VC022
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/27/2014
Initial Date FDA Received11/09/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/27/2015
02/19/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-