Model Number T505C225 |
Device Problems
Gradient Increase (1270); Occlusion Within Device (1423)
|
Patient Problems
Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Dyspnea (1816); Thrombus (2101)
|
Event Date 10/07/2014 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that approximately 45 months after implant, this bioprosthetic valve was explanted due to aortic stenosis after the patient presented with shortness of breath and the valve exhibited increased gradients during diagnostic testing.At explant, thrombus was observed on two of the three device leaflets.There also was an observation of pannus at the annular level.The explanting facility was to conduct pathological testing prior to returning it to medtronic for analysis.No subsequent adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was reported that the device will be returned for analysis.A supplemental report will be filed when the analysis/investigation is completed.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information was received that the physician noted upon explant a visual anomoly regarding the stent covering (polyester m aterial) appeared to not be properly placed over the valve stent.Also noted was a large muscle shell on the valve tissue.The product return has been requested, however the device has not been returned.Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Without the product return, a root cause of the high gradient / stenosis cannot be determined.Pannus overgrowth is an inherent risk of surgical valve replacement.Reduced performance of the valve is attributed to thrombus and host tissue overgrowth.These findings are generally considered a patient-related condition.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Date of event was incorrectly reported as (b)(6) 2011.This has been changed to (b)(6) 2014, the date of explant.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|