• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION HANCOCK II AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION HANCOCK II AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number T505C225
Device Problems Gradient Increase (1270); Occlusion Within Device (1423)
Patient Problems Aortic Valve Stenosis (1717); Dyspnea (1816); Thrombus (2101)
Event Date 10/07/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that approximately 45 months after implant, this bioprosthetic valve was explanted due to aortic stenosis after the patient presented with shortness of breath and the valve exhibited increased gradients during diagnostic testing.At explant, thrombus was observed on two of the three device leaflets.There also was an observation of pannus at the annular level.The explanting facility was to conduct pathological testing prior to returning it to medtronic for analysis.No subsequent adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that the device will be returned for analysis.A supplemental report will be filed when the analysis/investigation is completed.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received that the physician noted upon explant a visual anomoly regarding the stent covering (polyester m aterial) appeared to not be properly placed over the valve stent.Also noted was a large muscle shell on the valve tissue.The product return has been requested, however the device has not been returned.Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Without the product return, a root cause of the high gradient / stenosis cannot be determined.Pannus overgrowth is an inherent risk of surgical valve replacement.Reduced performance of the valve is attributed to thrombus and host tissue overgrowth.These findings are generally considered a patient-related condition.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event was incorrectly reported as (b)(6) 2011.This has been changed to (b)(6) 2014, the date of explant.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HANCOCK II AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e. deere ave.
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4239900
MDR Text Key5062514
Report Number2025587-2014-00864
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
P980043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/29/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/10/2014
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/27/2015
Device Model NumberT505C225
Device Catalogue NumberT505C225
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/29/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured10/27/2010
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-