Legal counsel for patient reported that patient underwent a right total hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2009.Subsequently, patient's legal counsel reported patient was revised on (b)(6) 2011 due to patient allegations of pain, bone/tissue damage, loss of range of motion, elevated metal ion levels and metallosis.Review of invoice history confirms the modular head, taper adapter and femoral stem were removed and replaced.This report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff¿s complaint and the allegations contained therein are unverified.Additional information received in patient medical records revealed the (b)(6) 2011 revision was due to pain with ambulation and inability to walk.Patient had also experienced a periprosthetic greater trochanteric hip fracture treated with a cable, and subsequently had loosening of the stem component.The patient¿s operative report noted fibrous tissue within the canal of the femur.
|
Current information is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the event.Review of device history records show that lot released with no recorded anomaly or deviation.There are warnings in the package insert that state that this type of event can occur: under possible adverse effects, number 1 states, "material sensitivity reactions." number 4 states, ¿loosening or migration of the implants may occur due to loss of fixation, trauma, malalignment, bone resorption, excessive activity.¿ number 6 states, "inadequate range of motion due to improper selection or positioning of components." number 14 states, "intraoperative or postoperative bone fracture and/or postoperative pain." number 15 states, "elevated metal ion levels have been reported with metal on metal articulating surfaces." this report is based on allegations set forth in plaintiff¿s complaint, and the allegations contained therein are unverified.This report is number 4 of 4 mdrs filed for the same patient (reference 1825034-2014-06803 / 06805).
|