• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC FLEX; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC FLEX; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 500FA23
Device Problems Gradient Increase (1270); Incomplete Coaptation (2507)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/03/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that this newly-implanted mechanical heart valve was explanted and replaced after ultrasound showed that the patient¿s mitral valve pressure gradient was high.The physician suspected that there was an issue with the device¿s leaflets.No information was provided regarding the replacement device.No subsequent adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
Subsequently it was reported that the observed high mitral valve pressure gradients were associated with a bioprosthetic mitral valve that was previously implanted prior to this procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The product has been returned and analysis is in progress.Upon completion of analysis, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that the device will be returned for analysis.A supplemental report will be filed when the analysis/investigation is completed.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, the device was found to be within specifications.The complaint could not be confirmed.After the carbon subassembly was cleaned and dried, the leaflets were fully mobile.The sewing cuff met specification for stitching and back-stitching.No as-manufactured surface finish anomalies were identified.The as-returned dimensions for the orifice, left, and right leaflets met engineering drawing specifications.The crown to notch (c-n) gap was measured.The as-returned gap for the left and right leaflets were within engineering drawing specification.The roundness of the stiffening ring was assessed.The difference between the minimum circumscribed and maximum inscribed stiffening ring dimensions was 0.0003 inch which is within the engineering drawing specification.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC FLEX
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key4243214
MDR Text Key5015867
Report Number3008592544-2014-00038
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P990046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,company representati
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/04/2018
Device Model Number500FA23
Device Catalogue Number500FA23
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/04/2014
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/12/2015
Initial Date FDA Received11/11/2014
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
01/12/2015
01/12/2015
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/08/2014
01/13/2015
09/15/2017
09/15/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured12/05/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-